The pie chart below shows the main reasons why agricultural land becomes less productive. The table shows how these causes affected three regions of the world during the 1990s.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The diagram and form illustrate the factors to cause the reducing productive of agricultural land as well as deliver the proportion of land degradation in three north america, europe and oceania between 1990 and 2000.
It can be clearly seen that europe was seriously region affected by total land degraded. Overall, the reasons of degradation were usually about over-grazing, over-cultivation and deforestation.
The percentage of over-grazing was highest with 35%, which was worse than deforestation as it was 30%. Over-cultivation was lower than deforestation by 2%, with 28%. The remained part was for other factors.
In north america, there was a slightly influence for the land because of the total land degraded was 5% only, moreover, the deforestation in north america was 0.2%, that was better than europe with 9.8%. moreover, the proportion of over-cultivation was also confused at 7.7%, these two parts were the highest between three countries. Therefore, The total land degraded was 23% naturally. In oceania, the amazing part was about 0% over-cultivation, while the 11.3% of over-grazing was the biggest, and the finally land degraded was recorded with 13%.
- The graph below shows the consumption of fish and some different kinds of meat in a European country between 1979 and 2004.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparison where relevant. 78
- Both the poor and the rich find the accessibility into university difficult. Do you agree or disagree? 73
- The pie chart below shows the main reason why agriculture land becomes less productive. The table shows how these effected three regions of the world during the 1990s. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make compar 11
- The maps below show the center of a small town called Islip as it is now, and plans for its development.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 56
- The chart below shows information about changes in average house prices in five cities between 1990 to 2002 compared with 1989. 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 168, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'america' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'Americas'.
Suggestion: Americas
...tion of land degradation in three north america, europe and oceania between 1990 and 20...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 29, Rule ID: A_RB_NN[1]
Message: You used an adverb ('slightly') instead an adjective, or a noun ('influence') instead of another adjective.
...r factors. In north america, there was a slightly influence for the land because of the total land ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 204, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Moreover
... that was better than europe with 9.8%. moreover, the proportion of over-cultivation was...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, moreover, so, therefore, well, while, as for, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 7.0 257% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 3.97073170732 327% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 994.0 965.302439024 103% => OK
No of words: 183.0 196.424390244 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.43169398907 4.92477711251 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.67800887145 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.25547336666 2.65546596893 123% => OK
Unique words: 100.0 106.607317073 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.546448087432 0.547539520022 100% => OK
syllable_count: 297.0 283.868780488 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.33902439024 184% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 58.0938034561 43.030603864 135% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.4 112.824112599 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.3 22.9334400587 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.1 5.23603664747 136% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 1.13902439024 615% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0617121495569 0.215688989381 29% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0329974332203 0.103423049105 32% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0324208691662 0.0843802449381 38% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0536771777417 0.15604864568 34% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0370569401877 0.0819641961636 45% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.2329268293 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 61.2550243902 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.21 11.4140731707 124% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.58 8.06136585366 106% => OK
difficult_words: 47.0 40.7170731707 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.