Although many people value their public parks, this space could be better used for other purposes such as residential areas for the ever growing population or to develop business and boost economies. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
It is argued by some individuals that public parks are valuable places but it should be utilized to make more houses to incorporate the constantly increasing human population or corporate offices to live the economy of the nation. I completely disagree because the public parks are a vital place for the society to have a balanced life and the plants from such parks benefits to society to become healthier.
Firstly, Public parks are necessary to have a good social and healthy life for an individual. These places are important junctions to have get-together between society people in the name of the morning, evening walks and to perform exercises. Such activities keep them healthy and provide a platform for meeting each other and to build a strong relationship in between. For instance, we have often observed that culturing programs and children games competition held in these parks to encourage the society people to have more interaction and take maximum uses of such gardens by doing yoga activities.
Secondly, botanical gardens are much required in this polluted world to overcome pollution levels. These places are beneficial for the environment in terms of improving the quality of air by incorporating more and more plants to enhance the oxygen levels in the environment. For instance, the plantation will help in the reduction of Carbon dioxide levels and maintain the balance of ratio of different components of air. Ultimately will make the society cleaner and healthier for individuals.
Finally, although we required residential complex to allocate the rising population but not on the sacrifice of public parks, as such gardens are essential for the society to have more fit and clean environment for humans.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-08-31 | dnnghha | 95 | view |
| 2021-08-31 | dnnghha | 84 | view |
| 2021-05-14 | shain | 78 | view |
| 2019-07-09 | coolchris2100 | 89 | view |
| 2019-07-01 | bhatvishal@ | 73 | view |
- Some people argue that technological inventions, such as mobile phones, are making people socially less interactive. Do you agree or disagree? 67
- In many countries, very few young people read newspapers or follow the news on TV. What do you think are the causes of this?What solutions can you suggest?Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience 67
- Nowadays, people living in large cities face many problems in their daily lives. What are the problems? Do you think the government should encourage people to move to smaller towns? 67
- Some students tend to play computer games rather than do sports. Why is this? What can be done to tackle the problem? 73
- A government has a responsibility to its citizens to ensure their safety. Therefore, some people think that the government should increase spending on defence but spend less on social benefits. To what extent do you agree? 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 409, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...enefits to society to become healthier. Firstly, Public parks are necessary to h...
^^^
Line 3, column 495, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... cleaner and healthier for individuals. Finally, although we required residentia...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, firstly, if, second, secondly, so, for instance
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 12.0 24.0651302605 50% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1457.0 1615.20841683 90% => OK
No of words: 279.0 315.596192385 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.22222222222 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.08696624509 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82179712627 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 155.0 176.041082164 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.555555555556 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 477.0 506.74238477 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 4.76152304609 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 53.9283270908 49.4020404114 109% => OK
Chars per sentence: 132.454545455 106.682146367 124% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.3636363636 20.7667163134 122% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.18181818182 7.06120827912 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.196145488051 0.244688304435 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0757246799532 0.084324248473 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0481879182701 0.0667982634062 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.129349728253 0.151304729494 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0458949523334 0.056905535591 81% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.8 13.0946893788 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.64 50.2224549098 75% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.29 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.57 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 78.4519038076 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.78957915832 153% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.