Crime and punishment
In the context of global history, crime and punishment have long been controversial issues in society. While some people advocate the idea of implementing prolonged jail sentences, I would argue that approaching other methods is more plausible. This essay will discuss both views followed by my personal opinions.
On the one hand, lengthening prison sentences are believed to be practical and perceptibly. First and
foremost, prolonged penalties enable to decrease the recidivism rates of a minor crime. For instance,
criminals, being put under the circumstances of a long time of imprisonment, are likely to have a
second thought whether it is worth spending 10 or even 20 years behind bars for such trivial crimes such as stealing, vandalism, shoplifting and so on. What is more, being settled in prison provides people with more opportunities to execute self-reflection and rehabilitation. As a result, not only do those inmates have more time to mirror their faults but they also get supportive treatments and training, which would accelerate the readiness for reintegration.
On the other hand, there are always alternative solutions which are also recommended. To begin with, improving social welfares should be taken into consideration. In addition, when reaching the stage of a decent life, individuals will never intend to stop living in the lap of luxury, which ensures their hesitation towards illegal acts. Turning to education, the higher the level of formal education learners acquires, the more they can interpret about the impending consequences of causing crimes. Furthermore, investment in moral education is said to eradicate undesirable behaviors. Once having been acclaimed as sinners, criminals should be treated with compassion and forgiveness in order to get back to their unspoiled morality. As a result, showing the act of humanitarianism is the most sympathetic action that government should approve.
In conclusion, despite minor objections, I personally believe that more flexible ways rather than long-life sentences should be applied so as to lead the lost to the appropriate human-being.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-11-02 | vidung | 87 | view |
| 2023-12-20 | Ahmad_off | 61 | view |
| 2023-08-01 | hieu13092006 | 84 | view |
| 2023-07-25 | minhanhtran2112 | 73 | view |
| 2023-06-25 | hieu13092006 | 61 | view |
- Crime and punishment 89
- In the modern world, many children spend a lot of time in front of computers, televisions, and smartphones. This is very harmful to them.To what extent do you agree? 84
- In the modern world, many children spend a lot of time in front of computers, televisions, and smartphones. This is very harmful to them.To what extent do you agree? 56
- The graph below shows the quantities of goods transported in the UK between 1974 and 2002 by four different modes of transport.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 78
- In the modern world, many children spend a lot of time in front of computers, televisions, and smartphones. This is very harmful to them.To what extent do you agree? 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 137, Rule ID: SO_AS_TO[1]
Message: Use simply 'to'
Suggestion: to
...n long-life sentences should be applied so as to lead the lost to the appropriate human-...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, if, second, so, then, while, as to, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, such as, as a result, to begin with, what is more, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1804.0 1615.20841683 112% => OK
No of words: 326.0 315.596192385 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.53374233129 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24917287072 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.15329068186 2.80592935109 112% => OK
Unique words: 217.0 176.041082164 123% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.665644171779 0.561755894193 118% => OK
syllable_count: 561.6 506.74238477 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.6901450351 49.4020404114 105% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.75 106.682146367 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.375 20.7667163134 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.0625 7.06120827912 157% => OK
Paragraphs: 7.0 4.38176352705 160% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.100867051273 0.244688304435 41% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0325032846257 0.084324248473 39% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0816923777221 0.0667982634062 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.049305461092 0.151304729494 33% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0652610432902 0.056905535591 115% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 13.0946893788 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.79 12.4159519038 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.05 8.58950901804 117% => OK
difficult_words: 112.0 78.4519038076 143% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum five paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.