In some countries, many more people are choosing to live alone nowadays than in the past. Do you think this is a positive or negative development?
Today, more and more people tend to live by themselves. In my opinion, this tendency has both drawbacks and benefits perspectives.
We can not refuse that living alone will be harder for economic and personal reasons. On the economic side, they have to divide reasonable their money which pays for foods, the electric and freshwater monthly bills. Therefore, they must use economically and wisely their budget to have enough money for studying and entertainment. Besides, from a personal perspective, if they get sick or illness, and nobody knows about it, living alone people have to take care of or go to the medical centers by themselves. For example, two months ago, my older brother who ate some rotten eggs and got a fever and vomiting, he had to drive to the local doctor alone although he felt very exhausted.
However, this tendency has some positive sides to several jobs. Firstly, when people live alone, they will have more freedom about their time, so they can adjust it to have a flexible timetable. For instance, a surgeon, who usually has a night shift and sometimes have to stay late in the hospital. Therefore, they can go to the emergency room when they want and do not affect their roommates’ sleeping. Secondly, if a one-person household has his or her own space, it will offer a precious silent atmosphere, and they do not be disturbed by others. Because of this reason, it will advantage for the people who love to research such as scientists.
In conclusion, a majority of people are converting to living alone today, and I believe that this changing include both beneficial and detrimental sides.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-08-18 | qqwqe | 78 | view |
| 2019-08-15 | everjoe4life | 73 | view |
| 2019-08-07 | Jerry Turtle | 78 | view |
| 2019-07-16 | sawera15 | 11 | view |
| 2019-06-27 | Tri H. Ho | 67 | view |
- The consumption of the world's resources (oil, and water etc.) is increasing at a dangerous rate. What are causes and solutions? 78
- The graph below shows difference sources of air pollutants in the UK from 1990 to 2005. 56
- The table below shows changes in the numbers of residents cycling to work in different areas of the UK between 2001 and 2011. 78
- The map below is of the town of Garlsdon. A new supermarket (S) is planned for the town. The map shows two possible sites for the supermarket. 73
- The diagram below shows the water cycle, which is the continuous movement of water on, above and below the surface of the Earth. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...alone although he felt very exhausted. However, this tendency has some positive...
^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...o love to research such as scientists. In conclusion, a majority of people are...
^^^
Line 7, column 15, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...h such as scientists. In conclusion, a majority of people are converting to l...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, first, firstly, however, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, for example, for instance, in conclusion, such as, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 13.1623246493 23% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 10.4138276553 163% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 24.0651302605 133% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 26.0 41.998997996 62% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.3376753507 24% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1360.0 1615.20841683 84% => OK
No of words: 276.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.92753623188 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07593519647 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72155236969 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 163.0 176.041082164 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.590579710145 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 438.3 506.74238477 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 5.43587174349 202% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.6078720591 49.4020404114 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.1428571429 106.682146367 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.7142857143 20.7667163134 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.64285714286 7.06120827912 137% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.170409312037 0.244688304435 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0676936213204 0.084324248473 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0584327712175 0.0667982634062 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.126957884981 0.151304729494 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0344019608064 0.056905535591 60% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 13.0946893788 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.31 12.4159519038 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.53 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 69.0 78.4519038076 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.