Task 1: The information below gives details about household income and spending on food and clothes by an average family in one UK city in 2010 and 2013.
The table illustrates a typical household in one UK city’s income and the pie charts demonstrate how the family distributed their earning money on food and clothes in 2010 and 2013. Overall, the income of the family witnessed a remarkable decrease, while the amount of food and clothes cost slightly rose. With regards to spending on necessity, the need for healthy products increased while the amount of money spent on drinks and clothes fell.
In terms of total income, the household earned 29000 euros in 2010, 2000 euros greater than in 2013. However, the spending tendency had changed when they distributed more money on food and clothes expenditure, 14000 euros and 15000 euros in 2010 and 2013 respectively.
Looking at details, it is clear that the amount of money spent on fruits and vegetables had the most significant growth from 20% to 35% which is one-third of the necessity expense. Similarly, the proportion of dairy products also underwent the gently increasing trend with 5% greater compared to 2010.
To be contrast, the percentage of expense of protein such meat and fish dramatically declined 10% to 15% only. Likewise, the figure for spending on clothes had the same decrease proportion and then be 12% in 2013. Only the drinks and other food expenditure remained stable through three years.
- More and more people are becoming seriously overweight. Some people think a solution can be to increase the price of fattening foods. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 73
- The charts below show the reasons why people travel to work by bicycle or by car.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 78
- The chart below gives information about the number of social networking sites people used in Canada in 2014 and 2015.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 67
- The pictures describe the cutting tools created by our ancestors at two different ages 56
- The tradition that the family gets together to eat meals is disappearing. What are the reasons? What are the impact? 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...rend with 5% greater compared to 2010. To be contrast, the percentage of expens...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, likewise, look, similarly, so, then, third, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 6.8 176% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1112.0 965.302439024 115% => OK
No of words: 217.0 196.424390244 110% => OK
Chars per words: 5.12442396313 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.8380880478 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66589762177 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 128.0 106.607317073 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.589861751152 0.547539520022 108% => OK
syllable_count: 317.7 283.868780488 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.33902439024 184% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.4971013275 43.030603864 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.2 112.824112599 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.7 22.9334400587 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.3 5.23603664747 139% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.269169392544 0.215688989381 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0980094937204 0.103423049105 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0898013025011 0.0843802449381 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.143352141336 0.15604864568 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0969397340233 0.0819641961636 118% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.2329268293 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 61.2550243902 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.42 11.4140731707 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.46 8.06136585366 105% => OK
difficult_words: 52.0 40.7170731707 128% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.