The differences in wheat exports over three different areas
The graph gives information about the comparison in wheat exports in a half decade from 1985 to 1990 over three different areas. There where three areas will be figured out specifically in Australia, Canada, and European Community.
The units is measured in millions of tonnes. Overall, as can be seen that the most positive movement of exporter countries progression had to be European community clearly whilst the most declined amount of export was in Australia incrementally.
Regarding to the data, amount of wheat export in European Community was the most increased trend which marked at 17 millions of tonnes in 1985 initially and went up to 4 millions of tonnes higher in a half decade. Reversely, the most decreased load of export occurred in Australia which started at 15 millions of tonnes approximately in early decade and gradually got down about 4 millions of tonnes lower in 1990.
Differs with the former areas, thoroughly the most stable amount of export over half decade happened in Canada and tend to fluctuate which counted from 19 millions of tonnes firstly in 1985 and sharply increased around 6 millions of tonnes larger in 1988 briefly. Then it was back to drop down in 1990 which stood again at 19 millions of tonnes as the mark of stable trend.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-07-14 | Zahid6400 | 61 | view |
| 2024-07-14 | Zahid6400 | 67 | view |
| 2024-07-07 | Sajib Ahamed | 73 | view |
| 2024-07-07 | Sajib Ahamed | 67 | view |
| 2024-06-26 | Zahid6400 | 67 | view |
- CO2 emissions for different forms of transport in the European Union and the percentage of funds being spent on different form of transport 89
- Many things that used to be done in the home by hands are now being done by machines 73
- changes in annual spending by a particular UK in 1981, 1991, and 2001 67
- Many animal species are becoming extinct due to human activities on land and in sea 78
- Some people think that museums should be enjoyable places to entertain people, while others believe that the purpose of museums is to educate 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 11, Rule ID: AGREEMENT_SENT_START[4]
Message: You should probably use: 'are'.
Suggestion: are
...ada, and European Community. The units is measured in millions of tonnes. Overall...
^^
Line 4, column 114, Rule ID: CD_DOZENS_OF[1]
Message: Use a singular form of the numeral here: '17 million'.
Suggestion: 17 million
...he most increased trend which marked at 17 millions of tonnes in 1985 initially and went up to...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 169, Rule ID: CD_DOZENS_OF[1]
Message: Use a singular form of the numeral here: '4 million'.
Suggestion: 4 million
...tonnes in 1985 initially and went up to 4 millions of tonnes higher in a half decade. Reverse...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 299, Rule ID: CD_DOZENS_OF[1]
Message: Use a singular form of the numeral here: '15 million'.
Suggestion: 15 million
... occurred in Australia which started at 15 millions of tonnes approximately in early decade an...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 380, Rule ID: CD_DOZENS_OF[1]
Message: Use a singular form of the numeral here: '4 million'.
Suggestion: 4 million
...rly decade and gradually got down about 4 millions of tonnes lower in 1990. Differs with ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 153, Rule ID: CD_DOZENS_OF[1]
Message: Use a singular form of the numeral here: '19 million'.
Suggestion: 19 million
...nd tend to fluctuate which counted from 19 millions of tonnes firstly in 1985 and sharply incr...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 220, Rule ID: CD_DOZENS_OF[1]
Message: Use a singular form of the numeral here: '6 million'.
Suggestion: 6 million
...ly in 1985 and sharply increased around 6 millions of tonnes larger in 1988 briefly. Then it ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 324, Rule ID: CD_DOZENS_OF[1]
Message: Use a singular form of the numeral here: '19 million'.
Suggestion: 19 million
... drop down in 1990 which stood again at 19 millions of tonnes as the mark of stable trend.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
briefly, first, firstly, if, regarding, so, then
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 33.7804878049 151% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1062.0 965.302439024 110% => OK
No of words: 215.0 196.424390244 109% => OK
Chars per words: 4.93953488372 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.82921379641 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64358770919 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 115.0 106.607317073 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.53488372093 0.547539520022 98% => OK
syllable_count: 315.0 283.868780488 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 68.0145894276 43.030603864 158% => OK
Chars per sentence: 132.75 112.824112599 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.875 22.9334400587 117% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 5.23603664747 115% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 1.69756097561 471% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.207698962432 0.215688989381 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0977235935666 0.103423049105 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.111735734294 0.0843802449381 132% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.150101963324 0.15604864568 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.131122903214 0.0819641961636 160% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 13.2329268293 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.55 61.2550243902 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.3012195122 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.67 11.4140731707 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.11 8.06136585366 113% => OK
difficult_words: 57.0 40.7170731707 140% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.