The circular chart reveals the four main courses of land degradation and the tobular chart illustrates the different regions during the year of 1990. It shows the percentum.
The pie chart introduces the main cause of worldwide land degradation during the 1990s in the percentage scale, whereas the table shows reasons of land degradation by three regions: north america, europe and Oceania.
Over-grazing was the main reason of worldwide degradation and it reached 35 %. 30% and 28% of degradation was due to deforestation and over-cultivation respectively, leaving 7% for other reasons. it can be seen from the table, that europe had the largest percentage of land degradation, which was 23%. The lowest percentage of land degradation was in north america and it reached only 5%. In europe deforestation was the main cause of land degradation (9.8%), while in north america and oceania – over-cultivation (3.3%) and over-grazing (11.3%) respectively. In addition, deforestation percentage in europe was higher than north america’s and oceania’s combined. In north america and europe over-cultivation numbers were quite large, while in oceania there was no land degraded by over-cultivation.
In conclusion, over-grazing was the main cause of worldwide degradation in 1990s. europe percentage of degradation was largest of all three regions and all three regions had different predominant causes
- The graph below shows the proportion of the population aged 65 and over between 1940 and 2040 in three different countries. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 11
- The charts below show the proportions of British students at one university in England who were able to speak other languages in addition to English, in 2000 and 2010. 56
- of people who enjoy various movie types 2000 79
- The graphs below show information about electronic games in South Korea in 2003. 84
- Scientific research should be carried out and controlled by the governmentsrather than private companies. Do you agree or disagree? 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 197, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: It
...ectively, leaving 7% for other reasons. it can be seen from the table, that europe...
^^
Line 3, column 669, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...ica's and oceania's combined. In north america and europe over-cultivati...
^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
... land degraded by over-cultivation. In conclusion, over-grazing was the main c...
^^
Line 5, column 73, Rule ID: IN_1990s[1]
Message: The article is probably missing here: 'in the 1990s'.
Suggestion: in the 1990s
...the main cause of worldwide degradation in 1990s. europe percentage of degradation was l...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 83, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Europe
...ause of worldwide degradation in 1990s. europe percentage of degradation was largest o...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, so, whereas, while, in addition, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 3.97073170732 428% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1050.0 965.302439024 109% => OK
No of words: 185.0 196.424390244 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.67567567568 4.92477711251 115% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.68801715136 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.52483221332 2.65546596893 133% => OK
Unique words: 89.0 106.607317073 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.481081081081 0.547539520022 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 318.6 283.868780488 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.45097560976 117% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 40.3266661156 43.030603864 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.0 112.824112599 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.5 22.9334400587 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 5.23603664747 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 5.0 1.69756097561 295% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 0.0 3.70975609756 0% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 1.13902439024 790% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.160370080214 0.215688989381 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0805394439445 0.103423049105 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0633838537226 0.0843802449381 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.152258931645 0.15604864568 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0687843256623 0.0819641961636 84% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 13.2329268293 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 61.2550243902 73% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.66 11.4140731707 137% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.69 8.06136585366 95% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 40.7170731707 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.