In some countries, young people are encouraged to work or travel for a year between finishing high school and starting universities studies. Discuss the advantage and disadvantages for young people who decide to do this.
Nowadays it is believed that in several countries, teenager are boosted to work or travel for a year in their time after high school to college. There are both advantages and disadvantages for them who make that dictum. In this essay, I absolutely agree that it gives more benefits rather than disadvantages for some reason.
In the one hand, the main advantage of that issue is to explore real of ourselves through undertook many new experiences. It is because the high school grads directly ample knowledge to enter world work and struggling to keep it. By way of the work impressions, we will determine what the major which match with our passion. Another case, vacation with a purpose as travelling with learning program can open our mind and get new ideas. As the result, our probability to make wrong decision for taking a department would be come down. So, it is important to revisit that resolution to get unbelievable ourselves abilities and skills.
On the other hand, the negative of the decision is afraid to lazy taking college again because workplace better than study. When we already get new experience about work world, usually many people too lazy for taking college. For example, in my hometown most of my friends, they have stop a year to work or travelling and then now they did not put on interest to continue their study of college. Therefore, we do not need to read up again if we can survive to work and study is not guarantee our life better in future. So, there is no doubt of deciding to break before we are going to institute.
In conclusion, from right here I stand that I do not believe if having space to work or travel before go to university is a harm judgement. In NY opinion, it gives many positive to high school grads who take their time to other experiences.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-09-16 | Berliananda Maranditya | 73 | view |
| 2019-07-17 | nfahdiyah | 73 | view |
| 2019-07-17 | Abi Mufti | 73 | view |
| 2019-07-17 | RAHMAYANI | 61 | view |
| 2019-03-22 | Nguyễn Thảo Linh | 67 | view |
- The table below gives information on the proportion of carbohydrates, protein and fat in three different diets. 56
- The chart below show the comparison of different kind of energy production of France in two years 73
- The table below gives information on the proportion of carbohydrates protein and fat in three different diets 68
- The pie charts below show the average household expenditures in Japan and Malaysia in the year 2010 56
- The pie charts below show the average household expenditures in a country in 1950 and 2010 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 392, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to program'
Suggestion: to program
...h a purpose as travelling with learning program can open our mind and get new ideas. As...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 285, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Use past participle here: 'stopped'.
Suggestion: stopped
... hometown most of my friends, they have stop a year to work or travelling and then n...
^^^^
Line 5, column 509, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the future'?
Suggestion: in the future
... study is not guarantee our life better in future. So, there is no doubt of deciding to b...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, so, then, therefore, for example, in conclusion, no doubt, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 35.0 24.0651302605 145% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 48.0 41.998997996 114% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1488.0 1615.20841683 92% => OK
No of words: 319.0 315.596192385 101% => OK
Chars per words: 4.66457680251 5.12529762239 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22617688928 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6049194781 2.80592935109 93% => OK
Unique words: 180.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.564263322884 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 478.8 506.74238477 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 23.896178434 49.4020404114 48% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 93.0 106.682146367 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.9375 20.7667163134 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 7.06120827912 71% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.257674040581 0.244688304435 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0767865769641 0.084324248473 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0638209124585 0.0667982634062 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.162862417865 0.151304729494 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0909268705182 0.056905535591 160% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.5 13.0946893788 80% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 50.2224549098 121% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.75 12.4159519038 79% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.6 8.58950901804 88% => OK
difficult_words: 61.0 78.4519038076 78% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.