Some people think that the best way to increase road safety is to increase the minimum legal age for driving cars or riding motorbikes. To what extend do you agree or disagree?
It is generally believed that improving the security of traffic by increasing the maximum legal age for using private vehicles. In my opinion, I strongly agree with the foregoing view, but I consider other methods regarding to solve this issue.
Rising the maximum legal age for using vehicles is seen as one of the most effective solution for many reasons. Firstly, teenagers gain little knowledge about using or maintaining traffic, which makes them difficult in dealing with emergency situations. Experienced drivers usually have huge understanding to react with those situations. To illustrate, when the brake of car does not work, younger people tend to be frighten by doing nothing instead of solving the issue. Secondly, young people are not mature and less responsible for their behaviour, so they have been yet aware of the importance of the rules on traffic. Therefore, it is essential to ban this rule for many young people force them bear duties in case of occurring accidents.
However, other measurements should be taken into account for the purpose of improving safety in pavements. The first method may be taken is that increasing the strict on punishment for drivers causing accidents. For example, many carefulness drivers who drink too much and hit to other people in the road should be punished for life-sentence and compensate on large amount of money. Organising campaigns or events to educate in high schools is thought to be the second solution. It is essential for local governments to come to schools and teach students about many problems in driving cars, the way to solve and the duties to society.
In conclusion, beside increasing the maximum legal age for driving to protect the safety for citizens, people also have to be aware of their behaviour in travelling by private vehicles.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-04 | nguyen duc anh | 61 | view |
| 2019-07-25 | nhinguyen1098 | 56 | view |
| 2019-07-25 | nhinguyen1098 | 78 | view |
- Some people believe that unpaid community service should be a compulsory part of high school programmers (for example working for a charity, improving the neighbourhood or teaching sports to younger children). 61
- Increasing the price of petrol is the best way to solve growing traffic and pollution problems.To what extent do you agree or disagree with the above statement?What other measures do you think might be effective? 93
- Obesity is a serious problem in many countries, especially in rich countries. 61
- Some people believe that unpaid community service should be a compulsory part of high school programmers (for example working for a charity, improving the neighbourhood or teaching sports to younger children). 78
- Lacking of fresh water is becoming a global issue of increasing importance What problems does this shortage cause What measures could be taken to overcome these problems 79
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 292, Rule ID: ADMIT_ENJOY_VB[3]
Message: This verb is used with the gerund form: 'understanding reacting'.
Suggestion: understanding reacting
.... Experienced drivers usually have huge understanding to react with those situations. To illustrate, w...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, however, if, may, regarding, second, secondly, so, therefore, for example, in conclusion, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1522.0 1615.20841683 94% => OK
No of words: 297.0 315.596192385 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.12457912458 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15134772569 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74270894509 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 170.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.572390572391 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 477.9 506.74238477 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 28.2150090323 49.4020404114 57% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 108.714285714 106.682146367 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.2142857143 20.7667163134 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.28571428571 7.06120827912 132% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.224109075665 0.244688304435 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0747555780028 0.084324248473 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0629067919987 0.0667982634062 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.152457596484 0.151304729494 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0473187231325 0.056905535591 83% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.42 12.4159519038 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.93 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 78.4519038076 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.