Nations should pass laws to preserve any remaining wilderness areas in their natural state, even if these areas could be developed for economic gain.
Write a response in which you discuss your views on the policy and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider the possible consequences of implementing the policy and explain how these consequences shape your position.
“What is economic gain”? The research has shown that economic gain is a complex concept to understand and define covering all the pros and cons for all stakeholders. Therefore, currently it is being studied with the limited perspective i.e., money. The prompt suggests the promulgation of laws preserving the existing wilderness (w) even if gains have to sacrifice. In my view, this policy has positive impact on the human society and I would even support it by proving that it can address the problems created by selfish economic gains. The reasons supporting my views are presented in the following paragraphs.
First of all, w is not something created by humans and since pre-monolithic age scientists have seen disasters due to the harm to these w. For instance, the research has shown that w is an important part of cycles covering all natural things such as human being, animals, river, mountains and trees and bushes. For selfish gains, these had been exploited by humans by cutting trees to maintain a road for transportation and it has resulted in the contamination of under road metals and minerals. Further, the cutting of trees and changing the course of river due to a passage has resulted in the temperatures that is increasing. It used to maintain that which was conducive for any natural thing. Therefore, preserving trees and rivers in the w is not only necessary but mandatory for a human to live. It matters because after all what we are doing will be of no use if no one lives to enjoy the gains.
Secondly, the w is a home to carnivorous, herbivorous and omnivorous animals. The research has shown that there is a limited threat to humans from herbivorous animals but, if the habitat of carnivorous animals is threatened, they tend to move towards the human residential area which may lead to killing and death of many citizens. Further, these habitats consist of small lakes, rivers and tree shelter for them to satiate their natural desire and need. If any of these gets disturbed, it will break the rule and natural cycle of animals which would lead to the mass movement of these to the nearby residential areas in search of food, water and shelter. Hence, their w should remain preserved. It is significant since no one would be willing to savor gains if their own life is threatened.
Thirdly, the w has a source of experimental studies necessary to cure illness. For instance, scientists often gets anti-dote and other chemicals from the species of trees and rare types of animals which help to experiment and manufacture all sorts of drugs and medicines useful for preventing and curing diseases. Further, the w has helped maintain the cycle of seasonal rainfall which is now being changed and hurting the lives of many farmers dependent on these seasonal rains. The destruction of these w for gains has reduced 10 year long run average of rainfall and has resulted in increase of maximum temperature and has also reduced the difference between maximum and minimum temperature, therefore, leading the earth to more hotter environment. Therefore, policy makers not of only one country but also of all should come forward and implement such laws in solidarity. It is appreciable since it is present but not yet realised that our earth is on the brink of severe climate change.
Of course, some would argue that it is not required to spend money on these w when we have to cater the needs of the people who are homeless and have no food to eat. They may say that if these people were to given shelter and free food, it is necessary to cut these w and accommodate these people into the houses build on w. However, they must understand it from different angle and should rather champion that these people would have access to food coming from these w and if these are being damaged, what would have they to eat. And regarding their shelter, if w are altered to their homes, the balance of whole geography will undergo change and it will come back to hound them in the form of natural disasters of which the frequency has already increased. Therefore, the policy of preserving w is going to redress what the damage has been done already to the environment and would promote the well-being in long run.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2020-01-18 | wenki31 | 58 | view |
2019-12-29 | Sumaiya Mila | 50 | view |
2019-12-04 | Md. Kawsar Ahmed | 50 | view |
2019-11-14 | chapagain08 | 50 | view |
2019-11-06 | KarinaShine | 83 | view |
- In any situation, progress requires discussion among people who have contrasting points of view.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In dev 66
- As we acquire more knowledge, things do not become more comprehensible, but more complex and mysterious.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take 66
- Governments should not fund any scientific research whose consequences are unclear.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing 66
- The following appeared as a letter to the editor from a Central Plaza store owner."Over the past two years, the number of shoppers in Central Plaza has been steadily decreasing while the popularity of skateboarding has increased dramatically. Many Ce 69
- Some people believe that college students should consider only their own talents and interests when choosing a field of study. Others believe that college students should base their choice of a field of study on the availability of jobs in that field.Writ 66
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 728, Rule ID: MOST_COMPARATIVE[2]
Message: Use only 'hotter' (without 'more') when you use the comparative.
Suggestion: hotter
...rature, therefore, leading the earth to more hotter environment. Therefore, policy makers n...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, hence, however, if, may, regarding, second, secondly, so, therefore, third, thirdly, well, after all, for instance, of course, such as, first of all, in my view
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 35.0 19.5258426966 179% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 19.0 12.4196629213 153% => OK
Conjunction : 39.0 14.8657303371 262% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 18.0 11.3162921348 159% => OK
Pronoun: 57.0 33.0505617978 172% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 96.0 58.6224719101 164% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 12.9106741573 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 3515.0 2235.4752809 157% => OK
No of words: 731.0 442.535393258 165% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.80848153215 5.05705443957 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 5.19971265256 4.55969084622 114% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67630058931 2.79657885939 96% => OK
Unique words: 332.0 215.323595506 154% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.454172366621 0.4932671777 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 1090.8 704.065955056 155% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 13.0 6.24550561798 208% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 12.0 4.99550561798 240% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 30.0 20.2370786517 148% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 23.0359550562 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 60.3307181754 60.3974514979 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.166666667 118.986275619 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.3666666667 23.4991977007 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.93333333333 5.21951772744 114% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 10.2758426966 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 12.0 5.13820224719 234% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.83258426966 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.252886558867 0.243740707755 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.064330601884 0.0831039109588 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0420841645908 0.0758088955206 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.141962097165 0.150359130593 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0384877816562 0.0667264976115 58% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 14.1392134831 95% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 48.8420337079 114% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 12.1743820225 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.91 12.1639044944 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.07 8.38706741573 96% => OK
difficult_words: 150.0 100.480337079 149% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.8971910112 67% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 11.2143820225 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 30 minutes.
Rates: 62.5 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.75 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.