The chart gives information about the amount of oil discovered worldwide from 1950 to 2020
The given bar charts illustrates the disparity in the amount of oil being discovered globally during the period of 70 years, between 1950 and 2015, and the predicted figures in 2020.
Generally, the worldwide oil exploited amount shows a downward trends.
Specifically, the oil exploitation was recorded at 20 billion barrels in 1950 prior to a dramatic increase in the next 10 years, and reaching a peak at around 55 billion barrels in 1965. However, since that time, the amount fluctuated. In particular, about 37 billion barrels of oil was discovered in 1970, that amount rose slightly to just under 40 billion barrels in 1975, but again, the amount experienced a drop to approximately 17 billion barrels in the period of 10 years. It increased back to nearly 20 billion barrels in the succeeding five years, and decreasing by 15 billion barrels in 2015.
It is predicted that from 2015 to 2020, the amount of oil being exploited will fall down slightly by 1 or 2 billion barrels.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-09-05 | beauty flowers | 100 | view |
| 2021-02-11 | Manjot kaur7890 | 67 | view |
| 2019-09-10 | trpg143 | 73 | view |
| 2019-09-08 | trpg143 | 42 | view |
| 2019-08-01 | trpg143 | 78 | view |
- The table below gives information about the average annual distance travelled by adults and the types of travel in 1977 and 2007 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- Countries are becoming more and more similar because people are able to buy the same products anywhere in the world Do you think this is a positive or negative development 84
- In many countries, the costs of living are rising. What are the effects on individuals and society? Suggest solutions to this problem. 61
- International travel is becoming cheaper, and countries are opening their doors to more and more tourists. Do the advantages of increased tourism outweigh its disadvatages? 61
- The Table Below Shows the Numbers of Visitors to Ashdown Museum during the year before and after it was refurbished The charts show the result of surveys asking visitors how satisfied they were with their visit during the same two periods Summarise the in
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, in particular
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 825.0 965.302439024 85% => OK
No of words: 168.0 196.424390244 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.91071428571 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.60020574368 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78245001055 2.65546596893 105% => OK
Unique words: 93.0 106.607317073 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.553571428571 0.547539520022 101% => OK
syllable_count: 224.1 283.868780488 79% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 0.482926829268 828% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 63.4967458591 43.030603864 148% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.857142857 112.824112599 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.0 22.9334400587 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.42857142857 5.23603664747 85% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.25175847007 0.215688989381 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.130531202745 0.103423049105 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0844798009238 0.0843802449381 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.18811110119 0.15604864568 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.054680122032 0.0819641961636 67% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.2329268293 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 72.5 61.2550243902 118% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.49 11.4140731707 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.65 8.06136585366 95% => OK
difficult_words: 30.0 40.7170731707 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.