Rembrandt is the most famous of the seventeenth-century Dutch painters.
The reading and lecture are both about Rembrandt's painting "Portrait of an Elderly Woman in a White Bonnet". However, both have opposing views about it. The reading stats that the painting is not the work of the artist it is credited to. The lecturer challenges this statement made by the author and in her opinion, the artist is the original creator of the painting.
Firstly, the author says that the woman in the painting has inconsistency in the dress she is wearing and since the artist was very meticulous about the clothes in his painting, he wouldn't have made such an obvious mistake. The lecturer, however, rebuts his statement by saying that the collar was painted on the top of the original painting some 100 years after the original painting was created and because of this, we see such inconsistency.
Secondly, the writer contends that Rembrandt was a master of lights and shadows, but still, the painting has the woman's face appear illuminated by the light even though she is wearing a dark collar coat which should absorb light. He further posits this kind of error is very unnatural of the artist. This argument is challenged by the lecturer. He says as the collar was painted on top of the original painting and when that paint was removed it revealed that the artist's original collar was of light color which explains the illumination of the face. Thus, showing that he is the original artist of the painting.
Finally, it is stated in the article that the painting was made on a panel made of several pieces of wood glued together which the artist has never done with any of his different paintings. The lecturer, on the other hand, posits that the wood panel on which original painting was painted was glued with different pieces of wood to enlarge it and to add value to it. He elaborate on this by mentioning that the original wood used for the painting is of the same tree which Rembrandt used in his other paintings.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-08-02 | nusybah | 73 | view |
| 2023-06-06 | YasamanEsml | 73 | view |
| 2023-06-06 | YasamanEsml | 70 | view |
| 2023-04-23 | Yam Kumar Oli | 70 | view |
| 2023-02-24 | Muggle | 80 | view |
- "The following is taken from a memo from the advertising director of the Super Screen Movie Production Company. "According to a recent report from our marketing department, during the past year, fewer people attended Super Screen-produced movies 34
- Teachers' salaries should be based on their students' academic performance.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your position, be sure to address the most co 70
- Students are more influenced by their teachers than by their friends. 70
- TPO-3: Summarize the points made in the lecture, being sure to explain how they cast doubt on specific points made reading passage.Rembrandt is the most famous of the seventeenth-century Dutch painters. However, there are doubts whether some paintings att 73
- Claim: Governments must ensure that their major cities receive the financial support they need in order to thrive.Reason: It is primarily in cities that a nation's cultural traditions are preserved and generated.Write a response in which you discuss 75
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 182, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: wouldn't
...s about the clothes in his painting, he wouldnt have made such an obvious mistake. The ...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, firstly, however, if, second, secondly, so, still, thus, kind of, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 10.4613686534 201% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 5.04856512141 20% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 7.30242825607 110% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 12.0772626932 132% => OK
Pronoun: 34.0 22.412803532 152% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 46.0 30.3222958057 152% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.01324503311 80% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1620.0 1373.03311258 118% => OK
No of words: 341.0 270.72406181 126% => OK
Chars per words: 4.75073313783 5.08290768461 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.29722995808 4.04702891845 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.52344294469 2.5805825403 98% => OK
Unique words: 150.0 145.348785872 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.439882697947 0.540411800872 81% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 492.3 419.366225166 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.55342163355 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 3.25607064018 215% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 13.0662251656 107% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 21.2450331126 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 67.019377338 49.2860985944 136% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.714285714 110.228320801 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.3571428571 21.698381199 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.42857142857 7.06452816374 105% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 4.33554083885 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0211096248202 0.272083759551 8% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.00942110712363 0.0996497079465 9% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0182764698642 0.0662205650399 28% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0156228203351 0.162205337803 10% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.00982090005472 0.0443174109184 22% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 13.3589403974 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 64.04 53.8541721854 119% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.0289183223 93% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.57 12.2367328918 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.56 8.42419426049 90% => OK
difficult_words: 59.0 63.6247240618 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.7273730684 103% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.498013245 110% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.