Educational institutions have a responsibility to dissuade students from pursuing fields of study in which they are unlikely to succeed.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your position, be sure to address the most compelling reasons and/or examples that could be used to challenge your position.
The issue brings into light a rather controversial issue of whether the educational institutes should discourage the students from pursuing a career field they are not inclined towards. The issue takes a compelling stand in the sense that it might bolster the individual development of people and hence I stand in resolute support to the given statement.
Imagine if Leonardo Da Vinci had been scratching his head over quantum physics, if Maddona was an investor at the Wall Street and if Elon Musk was a singer at the Opera House. That seems like a very incongruous mix, doesn't it? The pith of this very problem is tackled by the issue statement. Educational institutions can understand the inclination of the student, and nurture his talents accordingly. An NBA enthusiast may be encouraged to try out for the sports scholarship, and a budding scientist may be given a chance to work in the state laboratories.
Tackling unnecessary subjects in college which may be irrelevant to one's career, may cause a student to feel stressed out and tenuous. It not only asks for investments in time and energy but gouges out a fair amount of money from their pocket. Students may have to devote extra time just to complete their credits and end up spending more on the already staggeringly high tuition fees. Students often resort to taking new jobs to handle this monetary pressure, adding to their volcanic stress levels. A math student does not need to learn about the nuances of Napolean's tax policy, nor will a liberal arts student find a use for constructing algorithms in Java.
The probability of a student reaching his zenith is considerably increased by nurturing his talent from the very beginning. The student can begin their professional career much more quickly and starts contributing to society and the nation by turning into a valuable asset. As the student has a very biased training dedicated to his interests, opportunities come knocking on his door. Doubt on this whole argument can be cast be the fact of the existence of students who are unsure of their strengths and career paths. However, the doubt is overshadowed by the fact that only a few number of students exist who are unsure, and this issue can easily be solved by career counseling and sagacious guidance.
In a nutshell, it would be prudent to conclude that educational institutes do have a major role in shaping the future of the students, and given the freedom to dissuade the students from fields they are unlikely to succeed in, it will only strengthen the student's possibility to reach his zenith.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-29 | jenniferjack07 | 66 | view |
| 2020-01-27 | lanhhoang | 83 | view |
| 2020-01-23 | lanhhoang | 16 | view |
| 2020-01-22 | AkkineniAnuhya4 | 50 | view |
| 2020-01-20 | maneesha ch | 50 | view |
- Nations should pass laws to preserve any remaining wilderness areas in their natural state, even if these areas could be developed for economic gain. 50
- Governments should offer free university education to any student who has been admitted to a university but who cannot afford the tuition. 62
- Educational institutions have a responsibility to dissuade students from pursuing fields of study in which they are unlikely to succeed.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and suppo 83
- A recent study rating 300 male and female advertising executives according to the average number of hours they sleep per night showed an association between the amount of sleep the executives need and the success of their firms. Of the advertising firms s 63
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 216, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...That seems like a very incongruous mix, doesnt it? The pith of this very problem is ta...
^^^^^^
Line 2, column 456, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'sports'' or 'sport's'?
Suggestion: sports'; sport's
...st may be encouraged to try out for the sports scholarship, and a budding scientist ma...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 69, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
...s in college which may be irrelevant to ones career, may cause a student to feel str...
^^^^
Line 4, column 578, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun number seems to be countable; consider using: 'few numbers'.
Suggestion: few numbers
...is overshadowed by the fact that only a few number of students exist who are unsure, and t...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 256, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'students'' or 'student's'?
Suggestion: students'; student's
...succeed in, it will only strengthen the students possibility to reach his zenith.
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, but, hence, however, if, may, so, then, thus
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 19.5258426966 87% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 12.4196629213 121% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 14.8657303371 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.3162921348 62% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 28.0 33.0505617978 85% => OK
Preposition: 61.0 58.6224719101 104% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 12.9106741573 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2147.0 2235.4752809 96% => OK
No of words: 436.0 442.535393258 99% => OK
Chars per words: 4.92431192661 5.05705443957 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.56953094068 4.55969084622 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80364461989 2.79657885939 100% => OK
Unique words: 247.0 215.323595506 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.566513761468 0.4932671777 115% => OK
syllable_count: 669.6 704.065955056 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 6.24550561798 64% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.99550561798 160% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 1.77640449438 281% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 4.38483146067 23% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.2370786517 89% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 23.0359550562 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.0741695642 60.3974514979 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.277777778 118.986275619 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.2222222222 23.4991977007 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.16666666667 5.21951772744 61% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 7.80617977528 64% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 10.2758426966 107% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.142610106762 0.243740707755 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0420831211461 0.0831039109588 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0493492152212 0.0758088955206 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0899810992667 0.150359130593 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0554058425771 0.0667264976115 83% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 14.1392134831 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 48.8420337079 114% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 12.1743820225 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.55 12.1639044944 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.25 8.38706741573 110% => OK
difficult_words: 122.0 100.480337079 121% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.8971910112 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 11.2143820225 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 83.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.