Do you agree/disagree with the following statement? Technology has made children
less creative than they were in the past. Use specific reasons and examples to support
your answer.
Some people say that technology has had a negative impact on the minds of children
and made them less creative. They cite this viewpoint on the basis of how easy things
have become because of technology. However, I disagree with these people and I think
that technology has come as a boon to children and pushes children to get out of their
comfort zones and become more creative. I will support my point of view with two
reasons.
First of all, technology positively impacts the actions of young children because it has
the ability to bring the whole world to just a laptop. As a result, children can get a vast
exposure to different areas of studies and arts in a small duration of time. For example,
online courses and fun and creative videos on the internet can provide a child with
many new concepts which the child had never thought of, and thus, after being
exposed to such information his brain starts to develop though processes that in-turn
make a child more creative. In the past, before the advent of internet into the lives of
children, they were only exposed to ideas promoted by their parents and teachers.
These limited ideas caused their creative power to stick to a very restricted path. Thus,
because of the internet children nowadays can think and work on whatever they want
by learning things from around the globe with just a click of a button.
Second of all, advancements in the field of technology has made it possible to
manufacture devices such as musical instruments, microscopes, telescopes, and a lot of
other equipment at a much cheaper rate. For example, parents can now afford to buy a
telescope for their child and let him explore the vastness of the outer-space. Before
these technological improvements, parents could never think of getting a telescope for
their kids as it would cost a fortune, and as result, children could never take a look at
how planets and moons really look like apart from just seeing their pictures in the
textbooks. This would limit a child's brain to just think around the book as it was only
exposed to a mere book. But now that is not the case. Getting hands-on experience has
become very easy and this has a direct impact of how creative a child's brain can get.
Thus, according to me the world of technology has boosted the creative side of a child
upto ten-folds.
To conclude, technology has had multiple effects of human life. Some maybe bad, but
some are surely positive and enrich human lives. In my opinion technology has had its
positive effects on how children learn new things and how their brains get trained every
day to become more creative than the previous day.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-08-07 | jonnybravo | 73 | view |
- Scandals are useful because they focus our attention on problems in ways that nospeaker or reformer ever could.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your position, be s 16
- People remember special gifts or presents that they have received. Why? Use specificreasons and examples to support your answer. 73
- Do you agree/disagree with the following statement? Technology has made childrenless creative than they were in the past. Use specific reasons and examples to supportyour answer. 73
- In any field of endeavor, it is impossible to make a significant contribution without firstbeing strongly influenced by past achievements within that field.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree withthe statement a 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 33, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Positive
...In my opinion technology has had its positive effects on how children learn new thing...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, look, may, really, second, so, thus, apart from, for example, i think, such as, as a result, first of all, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 15.1003584229 33% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 9.8082437276 102% => OK
Conjunction : 19.0 13.8261648746 137% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 11.0286738351 45% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 34.0 43.0788530466 79% => OK
Preposition: 70.0 52.1666666667 134% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.0752688172 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2239.0 1977.66487455 113% => OK
No of words: 464.0 407.700716846 114% => OK
Chars per words: 4.82543103448 4.8611393121 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.64119157421 4.48103885553 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.49154989125 2.67179642975 93% => OK
Unique words: 228.0 212.727598566 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.491379310345 0.524837075471 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 680.4 618.680645161 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 6.0 1.86738351254 321% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 9.0 4.94265232975 182% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.1344086022 114% => OK
Sentence length SD: 67.8815880781 48.9658058833 139% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.95 100.406767564 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.2 20.6045352989 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.25 5.45110844103 133% => OK
Paragraphs: 31.0 4.53405017921 684% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.11452922623 0.236089414692 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0364022995596 0.076458572812 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.027219670846 0.0737576698707 37% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0314344599188 0.150856017488 21% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0298819692174 0.0645574589148 46% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 11.7677419355 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 58.1214874552 97% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.1575268817 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.03 10.9000537634 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.81 8.01818996416 97% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 86.8835125448 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.0537634409 111% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.