The chart below shows the number of men and women in further education in Britain in three periods and whether they were studying full-time or part-time. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The visualization given compares the rate of males and females in higher levels of education in Britain in three periods in terms of full-time and part-time schooling.
It is clear that the number of females studying part-time fluctuated over the period, while that of the counterparts went up sharply during the time frame. Besides, the ratio of both men and women taking part in full-time education rose steadily in three periods.
It can be seen that at the beginning of the time frame, males was dominant in terms of part-time education with the figure at 1 million, whereas the mark for women was under 800 thousand. However, the number of males participating in part-time schooling declined steadily to under 900 thousand in the next period before ending the time frame at a high of about 900 thousand. In contrast, the more females joined part-time education in comparison with the previous period, at approximately 850 thousand and increased dramatically to over 1.1 million at the end of the period.
On the other hand, the figures for both men and women getting full-time education raised consistently over the period. At the end of the time frame, nearly the same number of males and females had full-time education.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-24 | Piya Bera | 73 | view |
| 2020-01-23 | Nihad | 84 | view |
| 2019-12-25 | Shivam7090 | 89 | view |
| 2019-11-25 | azizkhon | 84 | view |
| 2019-11-14 | phamngocduyen | 67 | view |
- The bar chart below shows the percentage of Australian men and women in different age groups who did regular physical activity in 2010 Summarise the information by selecting the reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 87
- The line graphs show the production and demand for steel in million stones and the number of workers employed in the steel industry in the UK in 2010 56
- The two maps below show road access to a city hospital in 2007 and 2010 73
- The line graphs show the production and demand for steel in million stones and the number of workers employed in the steel industry in the UK in 2010 78
- The graph below shows radio and television audiences throughout the day in 1992. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, however, so, whereas, while, in contrast, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 33.7804878049 130% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1028.0 965.302439024 106% => OK
No of words: 205.0 196.424390244 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.01463414634 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.78388967377 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73270887563 2.65546596893 103% => OK
Unique words: 104.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.507317073171 0.547539520022 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 320.4 283.868780488 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.9473865788 43.030603864 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 128.5 112.824112599 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.625 22.9334400587 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.5 5.23603664747 162% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.32578341227 0.215688989381 151% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.183646154702 0.103423049105 178% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0460333900182 0.0843802449381 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.248061956702 0.15604864568 159% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0431829878274 0.0819641961636 53% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 13.2329268293 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 61.2550243902 75% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 10.3012195122 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.07 11.4140731707 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.11 8.06136585366 101% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 40.7170731707 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.