The Maps below gives information on the Village Park ten years ago and now.
The maps illustrate the changes that have taken place in the Village Park ten years ago until now.
It can be seen that the Village Park has transformed in terms of both facilities and transportation infrastructure.
In more details, the current tennis court has been expanded to be 2 twice as big as that for old one. In the past, the car park located to the west of the park just had the capacity of 20 people, but nowadays it can cover 50 people. The children’s play area which was within reach of the tennis court has been converted to children’s park and softplay area. In the south of the map, the pond has been replaced by boating lake. Besides, there are some new facilities have been erected as: a picnic area, toilets and café which close to the boating lake.
Regarding the transportation infrastructure, the entrance of the park remains unchanged. In addition, there is a new circle path surrounding the Village Park so people can go around it easily.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-01-30 | hoang tuan minh | 78 | view |
| 2023-03-24 | appollo abu | 84 | view |
| 2023-06-07 | ililmaidatuz | 78 | view |
- The best way to deal with environmental problem is to increase the price of fuel. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 78
- The table shows the number of cars made in Argentina, Australia and Thailand from 2003 and 2009. 84
- The Maps below gives information on the Village Park ten years ago and now 62
- Many business meetings and discussions are happening online nowadays.Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages? 78
- The chart below gives information on the percentages of British people giving money to charity by age range for the years 1990 and 2010. 67
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, regarding, so, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 1.00243902439 299% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 22.0 33.7804878049 65% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 815.0 965.302439024 84% => OK
No of words: 171.0 196.424390244 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.76608187135 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.61617157096 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8724822369 2.65546596893 108% => OK
Unique words: 103.0 106.607317073 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.602339181287 0.547539520022 110% => OK
syllable_count: 243.9 283.868780488 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 20.270394394 43.030603864 47% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 90.5555555556 112.824112599 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0 22.9334400587 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.44444444444 5.23603664747 85% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.234445052998 0.215688989381 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0992240146153 0.103423049105 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.128569576096 0.0843802449381 152% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.183900229111 0.15604864568 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.153819434789 0.0819641961636 188% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.5 13.2329268293 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 69.11 61.2550243902 113% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.3012195122 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.39 11.4140731707 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.81 8.06136585366 97% => OK
difficult_words: 35.0 40.7170731707 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.