The graph below shows relative price changes for fresh fruits and vegetables, sugars and sweets, and carbonated drinks between 1978 and 2009.
The changed of relative price for fresh fruits and vegetables, sugars and sweets, and carbonated drinks from 1978 to 2009 is given in the line graph. Moreover, the line graph also provides trends in consumer price index in this time. Over all, it can be clearly seen that all figures had a significant rise by the end of the period.
To start with the beginning of the period, in 1970, all prices of products increased gradually at about 65 before started to fluctuated moderately at the same time between 1979 and 1985 around 85-90.
After 1985, the prices of fresh fruits and vegetables rose dramatically from roughly 110 to reach the peak of 340 in 2008, then it was expected to decline by the end of period. However, fresh fruits and vegetables always had a higher prices than consumer-price index. Next, there was a slight growth between 1985 and 2009 in the prices of sugar and sweet and carbonated drinks from 100 to 200 and 100 to 150 respectively, still lower than consumer-price index throughout the period.
- These days many countries provide free university education for all citizens, even though the cost of doing this is very high. What are the main benefits of free university education and are there any drawbacks ?Give reasons for your answer and include ex 73
- The graph below shows relative price changes for fresh fruits and vegetables, sugars and sweets, and carbonated drinks between 1978 and 2009. 84
- The graph below shows average house prices in four Massachusetts towns from 1988 to 2002 (in US dollars.)Summarize the information selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 56
- Living in a country where you have to speak a foreign language can cause serious problems, as well as practical problems.To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement? 73
- The bar chart below shows the average life expectancy in a number of regions compared to the global average Write a report summarizing the main features making comparisons where relevant 67
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, moreover, so, still, then, to start with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 33.7804878049 110% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 847.0 965.302439024 88% => OK
No of words: 177.0 196.424390244 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.78531073446 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.64748333727 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60382725453 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 106.0 106.607317073 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.598870056497 0.547539520022 109% => OK
syllable_count: 238.5 283.868780488 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.3230380965 43.030603864 117% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.0 112.824112599 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.2857142857 22.9334400587 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.42857142857 5.23603664747 161% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.358620106209 0.215688989381 166% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.179802936441 0.103423049105 174% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.221198918003 0.0843802449381 262% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.22368084218 0.15604864568 143% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.147365296931 0.0819641961636 180% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.2329268293 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 71.48 61.2550243902 117% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.8 11.4140731707 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.0 8.06136585366 99% => OK
difficult_words: 35.0 40.7170731707 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.