Employers sometimes ask people applying for jobs for personal information, such as their hobbies and interests, and whether they are married or single. Some people say that this information may be relevant and useful. Others disagree.
In many organisations, inquiry about applicant’s personal matter is a part of process towards recruitment. Sometimes the questions related one’s hobbies, interest or marital status asked during interview. One group of people are agree with this view-point whereas some are in against. Both the sides explained further before providing my person view.
To begin with, many positions in the company requires not only education qualification, but person’s behaviour or interest also evaluate for appoint a position. The higher position in organisation where one have to manage the team or staff at that time interviewer examine the quality of person with the degree. For example, person’s hobbie and interest represents their ability to accept the new things which becomes very helpful to judge what kind of work should allocate to one. Moreover, Interviewer can judge properly by receiving the information about the individual.
On contrary, many individuals have perception that they are not agreed with sharing their personal information to others. People who have shy personality are not comfortable to explain more about their personal life. Furthermore, it may happens that sometime personal information are not concern with the job position though the company asking about it because it is a part of interview process. For instance, it is irrelevant to ask about personal question for person who is applying for part-time job of tea-maker in accounting firm. It is wast of time to get the personal information of that person.
In conclusion, I believe the evaluation of the person should be proper before proving the job or position. But there must be a limit of personal question to know about the candidate.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-04 | jeetender | 67 | view |
| 2020-01-02 | PALAK AHUJA | 84 | view |
| 2019-12-25 | MihirGosai | 67 | view |
| 2019-11-29 | Harrynguyen1980 | 78 | view |
| 2019-11-24 | namodi17 | 73 | view |
- You have had a bank account for a few years Recently you received a letter from the bank stating that your account is 240 overdrawn and that you will be charged 70 which will be taken directly from your account You know that this information is incorrect 47
- In recent years, Many small local shops have closed because customers travel to large shopping centers or malls to do their shopping.Is this a positive or a negative development? 61
- At the present time, the population of some countries includes a relatively large number of young adults, compared with the number of older people.Do the advantages of this situation outweigh the disadvantages? 73
- While recruiting a new employee, the employer should pay more attention to their personal qualities, rather than qualifications and experience. To what extent do you agree or disagree? Give your opinion and include relevant examples. 73
- In many countries, children are engaged in some kind of paid work. Some people regard this as completely wrong, while others consider it as valuable work experience, important for learning and taking responsibility.What are your opinions on this issue?You 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 542, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'been'.
Suggestion: been
... of tea-maker in accounting firm. It is wast of time to get the personal information...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, if, may, moreover, so, whereas, for example, for instance, in conclusion, kind of, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 8.3376753507 204% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1467.0 1615.20841683 91% => OK
No of words: 272.0 315.596192385 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.39338235294 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.06108636974 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.00304190863 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 159.0 176.041082164 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.584558823529 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 473.4 506.74238477 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.2930735303 49.4020404114 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.8 106.682146367 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.1333333333 20.7667163134 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.0 7.06120827912 113% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 3.4128256513 234% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.257324758778 0.244688304435 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0898684429819 0.084324248473 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0558486620926 0.0667982634062 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.150547365997 0.151304729494 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0766922138856 0.056905535591 135% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.69 12.4159519038 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.94 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 78.4519038076 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.