The percentage of school aged boys in two different age groups who participated in 5 different sports in the UK in 2010.
The table chart gives information about how 5 different sports attracted boys who were in 2 aged groups in the UK in 2010.
Overall, it can be seen that boys 6-11 were active in these sports than 12-16 boys. Besides, football was considered the most favorite activity in both groups.
Regarding the boys 6-11, there were 87% of boys loved football which were twice as high as that for cricket. Basketball and rugby were also popular sports among this aged group, with 35% and 25% respectively. In contrast, the figure for swimming is lowest, with only 19%.
Looking for boys 12-16, swimming and rugby had the similar figures for participants, at around 20% each. This number was lower than that for basketball, with 25%. The most preferred sport in this group was football, with 78%, which were 44% higher than that for cricket.
- TOPIC: The percentage of school aged boys in two different age groups who participated in 5 different sports in the UK in 2010. 61
- Some people think that it is better for students to learn local history than world history.Do you agree or disagree? 61
- Along with the economic development, the environment of the world is being seriously polluted.What economic activities can cause harm to environment?What can be done to prevent this? 73
- TOPIC: Everyone should stay in school until they reach 18. Do you agree/disagree? 56
- The best way to deal with environmental problem is to increase the price of fuel. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, if, look, regarding, so, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.15609756098 222% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 17.0 33.7804878049 50% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 697.0 965.302439024 72% => OK
No of words: 143.0 196.424390244 73% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.87412587413 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.45807182446 3.73543355544 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.33675281366 2.65546596893 88% => OK
Unique words: 93.0 106.607317073 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.65034965035 0.547539520022 119% => OK
syllable_count: 186.3 283.868780488 66% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 22.4926829268 67% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 21.2277479717 43.030603864 49% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 77.4444444444 112.824112599 69% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.8888888889 22.9334400587 69% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.66666666667 5.23603664747 108% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.205508321362 0.215688989381 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0895931476534 0.103423049105 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.131021404491 0.0843802449381 155% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.163961529723 0.15604864568 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.160770089773 0.0819641961636 196% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.5 13.2329268293 72% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 81.63 61.2550243902 133% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 5.6 10.3012195122 54% => Flesch kincaid grade is low.
coleman_liau_index: 10.67 11.4140731707 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.25 8.06136585366 90% => OK
difficult_words: 26.0 40.7170731707 64% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 11.4329268293 57% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.9970731707 73% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 150 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.