Highest education level of women in someland
The pie charts illustrate the differences in the highest level of education of females in someland over the period from 1945 to 1995. Units are measured in percentage.
Overall, women has become more well-educated after the period given. It is surprising to note that as many as 100% of females completed the education level of year 9 and higher in 1995 in comparison to just 15% in 1945.
First of all, all women has pursued a level of education of year 9 and higher in 1995 in which the figure for a first degree was at a highest proportion, 50%. Subsequently, the figure for a posgraduate degree was equal to the figure for year 12 and was at 20%. Finally, the percentage for the number of women has finished year 9 was at 10%.
Conversely, the previous five decades saw a much lower percentage of women pursuing an education level of year 9 and above, which was 15%. Specifically, year 9 constituted 10% of this proportion, year 12 made up 4%, and the figure for a first degree was at 1%.
Notably, there were no females which had a level of education of year 6 and lower in 1995. In contrast, there was up to 85% of women who had this level of education in 1945 in which 35% of females completed third grade, 35% has never attended school whilst 15% of them finished year 6.
- Economic growth is the only way to end world poverty. However, some people say it leads to environmental damage and should be stopped. To what extent do you agree? 73
- The graph shows the number of boys and girls playing sport in an English town in 2012 79
- In many countries women no longer feel the need to get married. Some people believe that this is because women are able to earn their own income and therefore do not require the financial security that marriage can bring.To what extent do you agree? 73
- Wild animals have no place in the 21st century, so protecting them is a waste of resources. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 84
- Wild animals have no place in the 21st century, so protecting them is a waste of resources. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 133, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[1]
Message: Use 'the' with the superlative.
Suggestion: the
...ch the figure for a first degree was at a highest proportion, 50%. Subsequently, ...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
conversely, finally, first, if, so, third, well, in contrast, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 33.7804878049 130% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 3.97073170732 201% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1048.0 965.302439024 109% => OK
No of words: 236.0 196.424390244 120% => OK
Chars per words: 4.4406779661 4.92477711251 90% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.91947592106 3.73543355544 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64651125688 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 108.0 106.607317073 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.457627118644 0.547539520022 84% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 318.6 283.868780488 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.9565901564 43.030603864 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.2727272727 112.824112599 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.4545454545 22.9334400587 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.72727272727 5.23603664747 128% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.318117518138 0.215688989381 147% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.13554036338 0.103423049105 131% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.103665002351 0.0843802449381 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.200636046562 0.15604864568 129% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0603523351155 0.0819641961636 74% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.2 13.2329268293 77% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 61.2550243902 110% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.47 11.4140731707 74% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.02 8.06136585366 87% => OK
difficult_words: 35.0 40.7170731707 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.