Some people think that the best way to increase road safety is to increase the minimum age for driving cars or riding motorbikes. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Some people believe that the optimal method of making roads more secure is to raise the legal driving age. While this may work to a certain extent, I would argue that there are superior ways to curb traffic accidents.
It is understandable why some people advocate banning young people from driving. Firstly, young drivers tend to drive in a careless way, which may result in accidents. For instance, many Vietnamese youngsters disregard traffic laws and commit serious offences such as running red lights, contributing to the escalating rates of injuries and fatalities. Secondly, due to a lack of experiences, it is unlikely that young people can handle road incidents quickly and efficiently, especially in dangerous situations such as slippery road surface or adverse weather conditions. Therefore, a ban on young drivers could be a good way to minimize the likelihood of accidents when driving.
Nonetheless, I believe that such a scheme could be unworkable in the long run. As reckless driving occurs both among the old and the young, increasing the legal driving may not be a solution to the problems of accidents. Instead, governments should adopt more viable solutions to reduce accidents. One feasible solution is administering harsher punishments on people who violate traffic laws. For example, authorities could levy higher fines on traffic offenders or confiscate their driver's licence indefinitely. Another measure is to provide funding for improving road infrastructures. This is because accidents not only stem from bad driving but also low standards of roadways.
In conclusion, I strongly believe that there are better solutions, as listed above, to increase road safety more comprehensively.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-08-25 | tran ngoc lam | 78 | view |
- Many people try to balance work and other parts of their life However this is very difficult to do What are the problems associated with this What is the best way to achieve a better balance 85
- Governments should spend money on railways rather than roads. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement? 84
- Today, the high sales of popular consumer goods reflect the power of advertising and not the real needs of the society in which they are sold. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 73
- Global warming is one of the most serious issues that the world is facing today What are the causes of global warming and what measures can governments and individuals take to tackle the issue 92
- Global warming is one of the biggest threats to our environment. What causes global warming? What solutions are there for this problem? 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 119, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a careless way" with adverb for "careless"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...g. Firstly, young drivers tend to drive in a careless way, which may result in accidents. For ins...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, may, nonetheless, second, secondly, so, therefore, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 41.998997996 69% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1454.0 1615.20841683 90% => OK
No of words: 267.0 315.596192385 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.4456928839 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.04229324003 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.02184298391 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 168.0 176.041082164 95% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.629213483146 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 451.8 506.74238477 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 40.2168566096 49.4020404114 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.9333333333 106.682146367 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.8 20.7667163134 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.93333333333 7.06120827912 127% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.201335253822 0.244688304435 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0626549543508 0.084324248473 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0481009207263 0.0667982634062 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.129703641237 0.151304729494 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0231184693057 0.056905535591 41% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 13.0946893788 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 50.2224549098 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.03 12.4159519038 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.39 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 78.4519038076 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.