travelling by air among rich and ordinary people.what extent do you agree and disagree
The importance of travelling by air among and ordinary people which was always debatable has now become more controversial with many people claiming that it is beneficial while other reject this notion this essay will further elaborate and both aspects of this trend and this will lead to a logical conclusion.
There are myriad of reason which will further explain this argument but the most preponderant one stems from the fact that the rich people air travelling benefit and enjoy the life and rich people always air travelling by not waste time and not traffic problem .Another pivotal aspects of this argument is that and rich many travelling by very entertainment .needless to say that all these merits stand travel by air among and ordinary people in a good stead.
However there are some pitfalls that negate this argument and which can certainly over whelm the potential influence of this trend but the most alarming is that the ordinary peoples is not budged that travelling by air hence it is apperant why many are against travelling by air among and ordinary people.
According to the argument aforementioned above one can reach conclusion that the benefit are travelling by air among and ordinary people instrumental indeed nevertheless the potential drawbacks should not be overlooked either.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-07 | manpreet9999 | 77 | view |
| 2019-11-23 | priyankavs23 | 80 | view |
| 2019-10-25 | Jaskaransingh11 | 70 | view |
| 2019-10-17 | Jaskaransingh11 | 72 | view |
| 2019-10-01 | manpreet9999 | 55 | view |
- what is topic ? 22
- Travelling to study is over-rated. We have brilliant scholars who studied locally. Is travel really necessary for tertiary studies? 56
- what are the advantages and disadvantages of tourism in developing countries 80
- travelling by air among rich and ordinary people.what extent do you agree and disagree 55
- what are the advantages and disadvantages of tourism in developing countries ? 22
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 219, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...fe and rich people always air travelling by not waste time and not traffic proble...
^^
Line 3, column 262, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...y not waste time and not traffic problem .Another pivotal aspects of this argument...
^^
Line 3, column 264, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Another
...not waste time and not traffic problem .Another pivotal aspects of this argument is tha...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 359, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...ch many travelling by very entertainment .needless to say that all these merits st...
^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
...and ordinary people in a good stead. However there are some pitfalls that negate thi...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 82, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...te this argument and which can certainly over whelm the potential influence of th...
^^
Line 7, column 228, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...wbacks should not be overlooked either.
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, hence, however, if, look, nevertheless, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.5418719212 104% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 8.36945812808 155% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 5.94088669951 185% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 20.9802955665 91% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 31.9359605911 78% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.75862068966 122% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1102.0 1207.87684729 91% => OK
No of words: 214.0 242.827586207 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.14953271028 5.00649968141 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.82475343497 3.92707691288 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64939672301 2.71678728327 98% => OK
Unique words: 110.0 139.433497537 79% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.514018691589 0.580463131201 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 343.8 379.143842365 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 4.6157635468 0% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.71428571429 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.65517241379 27% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 4.0 12.6551724138 32% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 53.0 20.5024630542 259% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 84.5739321541 50.4703680194 168% => OK
Chars per sentence: 275.5 104.977214359 262% => Less chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 53.5 20.9669160288 255% => Less words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 13.5 7.25397266985 186% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 5.33497536946 131% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 6.9802955665 43% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 2.91625615764 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.253113230137 0.242375264174 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.173177172861 0.0925447433944 187% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0618447821426 0.071462118173 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.173177172861 0.151781067708 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0618447821426 0.0609392437508 101% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 29.6 12.6369458128 234% => Automated_readability_index is high.
flesch_reading_ease: 17.68 53.1260098522 33% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 6.54236453202 199% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 24.0 10.9458128079 219% => Flesch kincaid grade is high.
coleman_liau_index: 13.48 11.5310837438 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.51 8.32886699507 114% => OK
difficult_words: 44.0 55.0591133005 80% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 28.5 9.94827586207 286% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 23.2 10.3980295567 223% => Gunning_fog is high.
text_standard: 13.0 10.5123152709 124% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 55.5555555556 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 50.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.