Are famous people treated unfairly by the media? Should they be given more privacy, or is the price of their fame an invasion into their private life?
Nowadays, the invasion of privacy from mass media has been receiving a great deal of public attention. Although the media somehow violates the private lives of celebrities, there are not without merits from its regular job.
First, since many channels are simultaneously participating to offer varying or even contradicting opinions, the duty of media firms should be considered fair to famous figures. In fact, the media decide not to have a bias towards celebrities, and they make the sources of information publicized objectively, which helps audiences judge their idols from many angles of perspectives. Second, by humiliating or defaming public figures with any libel or slander, the media companies can feasibly get into significant liabilities because of the strict warning from laws, blocking these organizations from the public as a result.
Moreover, the reputation of famous people is the main factor that endangers their privacy. First, as an inevitable result of being popular, superstars always suffer invasion on privacy from the journalist. For example, celebrities are frustrated and irritated when the media could dig into their personal life and dissect their stories for hooking views from the audiences, which helps those companies gain their enormous profits from the information. Second, being followed by media not always brings negative impacts on famous people, some good publicity is being received good fame from the viewers. In fact, famous figures spend time doing lots of charitable work as philanthropists, which helps themselves gain more impression from the public.
In conclusion, the media is not always harmful to celebrities’ life. By considering both perspectives, audiences should be alert whenever they tend to judge someone is reputable.
- Extreme sports such as sky diving and skiing are very dangerous and should be banned. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this view? 89
- Nowadays, many people buy things excessively. Why? Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages? 100
- As computers are being used more and more in education, there will be soon no role for teachers in the classroom. Do you agree or disagree? 100
- In some countries shopping online is replacing shopping at the store Discuss both the pros and cons of this trend 84
- Are famous people treated unfairly by the media? Should they be given more privacy, or is the price of their fame an invasion into their private life? 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, moreover, second, so, as to, for example, in conclusion, in fact, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 12.0 24.0651302605 50% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1528.0 1615.20841683 95% => OK
No of words: 272.0 315.596192385 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.61764705882 5.12529762239 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.06108636974 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.97370795705 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 170.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.625 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 464.4 506.74238477 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 5.43587174349 0% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.2351035725 49.4020404114 112% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.333333333 106.682146367 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.6666666667 20.7667163134 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.33333333333 7.06120827912 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.292994655278 0.244688304435 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.103846960538 0.084324248473 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0499958806794 0.0667982634062 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.160086602006 0.151304729494 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0729942509815 0.056905535591 128% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.4 13.0946893788 125% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.61 12.4159519038 126% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.55 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 78.4519038076 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.