The first chart below shows how energy is used in an average Australian household. The second chart shows the greenhouse gas emissions which result from this energy use.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The two pie charts compare the percentage of the energy consumed for various purposes and the greenhouse gas emitted by an average Australian family.
Overall, there is an appreciable difference in the proportion between energy utilization and their corresponding CO2 emissions. Whereas, heating accounts for the highest energy consumption, the largest proportion of greenhouse exhaust does not belongs to it but water heating.
As clearly shown in the first chart, 42% of energy consumed in an Australian family is used for heating, which constitutes the largest amount on the chart, followed by that of water heating, at 30%. Other energy consumptions makes up the rest one third of the pie chart, whereby the energy is burnt up at 15% for other appliances, 7% for refrigeration, 2% and 4% for cooling and lighting.
When it comes to CO2 emissions resulting from the aforementioned energy usages, the percentage appears rather unpredictable. Despite the highest proportion in energy expenditure, heating, in fact, emits only 15% of CO2 to the environment. By contrast, other appliances discharges greenhouse gas twice as much as the amount its energy consumption, at approximately 30%.
Likewise, greenhouse emissions derived from refrigeration constitutes 14% while other 8% of those gases goes to lighting. As a matter of fact, these figures are doubled their energy used in each family. However, unlike other categories, water heating and cooling experience a very modest raise in number, 32% and 3%, respectively.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-29 | RAYHAN MAHMUD | 67 | view |
| 2020-01-08 | CharanpreetSingh | 67 | view |
| 2020-01-07 | CharanpreetSingh | 78 | view |
| 2020-01-03 | sana_em | 67 | view |
| 2019-12-27 | AlisherBabajonov | 73 | view |
- Some people think that a huge amount of money is spent on the protection of wild animals, and that this money should be better spent on human population. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion? 89
- The first chart below shows how energy is used in an average Australian household. The second chart shows the greenhouse gas emissions which result from this energy use.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make compa 73
- Some people say that we do not need printed newspaper any more. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion? 89
- The best way to solve the world’s environmental problems is to increase the cost of fuel. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 89
- It is now possible for scientists and tourists to travel to remote natural environment,such as the South Pole. Do you think the advantages outweigh the disadvantages? 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 245, Rule ID: DOES_X_HAS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'belong'? As 'do' is already inflected, the verb cannot also be inflected.
Suggestion: belong
...oportion of greenhouse exhaust does not belongs to it but water heating. As clearly s...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 245, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[3]
Message: The verb 'does' requires base form of the verb: 'belong'
Suggestion: belong
...oportion of greenhouse exhaust does not belongs to it but water heating. As clearly s...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, likewise, third, whereas, while, in fact, as a matter of fact
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 3.97073170732 277% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1294.0 965.302439024 134% => OK
No of words: 237.0 196.424390244 121% => OK
Chars per words: 5.45991561181 4.92477711251 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.92362132708 3.73543355544 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.1197731306 2.65546596893 117% => OK
Unique words: 133.0 106.607317073 125% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.561181434599 0.547539520022 102% => OK
syllable_count: 396.9 283.868780488 140% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.45097560976 117% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 31.9141410145 43.030603864 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.636363636 112.824112599 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5454545455 22.9334400587 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.81818181818 5.23603664747 149% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 3.70975609756 243% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.27192090103 0.215688989381 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.104474077189 0.103423049105 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0654151602927 0.0843802449381 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.15444967936 0.15604864568 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0523954293791 0.0819641961636 64% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 13.2329268293 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 61.2550243902 68% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 10.3012195122 123% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.39 11.4140731707 126% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.01 8.06136585366 112% => OK
difficult_words: 65.0 40.7170731707 160% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.