Nowadays, most people learn academic study in university, but others think we should encourage to learn vocational skills more. Do you agree or disagree?
People have different views about whether people should take academic education or vocational study. While some people believe that we should promote more students to learn practical skills, I strongly advocate that it is more essential to take university education than vocational skills.
There are some reasons why we should not boost students to take vocational schooling. Compared with students who got university degrees, students who graduated from vocational schools usually got lower-paying positions. They have not much potential to advance in higher positions, such as manager, CEO, executive, because there are not many higher positions available in the trades. A recent survey showed that the average college graduate makes more money than the average vocational training students over a lifetime. In addition, specialization means students have no other career path. Trade schools limit students to one career path and specialize in training students on this career path thus offering them no other choice in their careers.
I believe that people should opt to study academic learning in university instead. Firstly, a wide number of fundamental knowledge and general education are provided for undergraduate students to choose from. This means that university education enables these students either to acquire deeper knowledge in a specific field or to acquire broad knowledge to explore their own interests in different fields. Secondly, college graduates have more and better employment opportunities. For example, as a data scientist, a recently emerging popular job, he needs to acquire knowledge and skills in statistics and programming. Finally, vast courses can cultivate undergraduate students’ love for art, literature, and other aspect of education.
In conclusion, my view is that it would be better, on balance, for students to receive university education and there is no need to make more students to study vocational training education.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-09-11 | rookiewriter | 73 | view |
- The graph below shows average carbon dioxide emissions per person in the United Kindom, Sweden, Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 67
- Nowadays, most people learn academic study in university, but others think we should encourage to learn vocational skills more. Do you agree or disagree? 73
- Some people think young people are not suitable for important positions in the government, while other people think it is a good idea for young people to take on these positions. Discuss both views and give your own opinion. 73
- In some countries governments pay the money for students' university fees，while in other countries, students pay for themselves. Do advantages of governments paying for the students outweigh its disadvantages? 78
- Some people think young people are not suitable for important positions in the government, while other people think it is a good idea for young people to take on these positions. Discuss both views and give your own opinion. 67
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, firstly, if, second, secondly, so, thus, while, for example, in addition, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1691.0 1615.20841683 105% => OK
No of words: 297.0 315.596192385 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.6936026936 5.12529762239 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15134772569 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89955101191 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 169.0 176.041082164 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.569023569024 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 538.2 506.74238477 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.0847362844 49.4020404114 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.733333333 106.682146367 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.8 20.7667163134 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.46666666667 7.06120827912 106% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.175698794068 0.244688304435 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0715625343881 0.084324248473 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.081395026418 0.0667982634062 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.124087531932 0.151304729494 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0730269331577 0.056905535591 128% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 13.0946893788 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.27 50.2224549098 70% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.72 12.4159519038 127% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.89 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 78.4519038076 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.