Some people think that it is more effective for students to study in groups while other belive that it is better for them to study alone. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
Opinions widely diverge on whether it is better for students to study individually or work with their classmates in a group. While there are some obvious advantages to study alone, my viewpoint is that group work brings more efficiency in terms of acquiring knowledge.
On the one hand, those who advocate individual studying would argue that it allows learners to study at their own convenience with little dependence on other people. To begin with, the process of learning is different among learners because each individual has their own learning style. For example, while some students prefer to work in a systematic and organized way, other peers seem to have a flexible and disorganized method. furthermore, individual studying tends to be the top priority for some students in case that teamwork may not work well. Collaborating with many other teammates sometimes may cause distractions; thus, group work can easily turn from study sessions into hangout sessions.
On the other hand, I still believe that co-studying with friends can bring more significant benefits in gaining academic knowledge and promoting the encouragement of learning. Firstly, group discussion helps pupils get more and deeper understanding of the class materials. Having other friends around, student, who finds the concepts and information from school incomprehensible at once, now can seek for detailed explanation from their teammates. Secondly, working in group creates motivation for many leaners because they can derive the energy from being around many people. Team work will undoubtedly create a healthy competitive environment which fosters learners’ effort to keep pace with. Sharing the mutual assistances in studying, students will have positive attitude towards learning and inspiration to pursue further education.
In conclusion, while some people would prefer to individual studying owing to its dependence and less distraction, I believe that group work is more worthwhile regarding the grasp of academic knowledge and learning motivation.
- In many countries, women and men are working full time. Is it, therefore, logical for men and women to share household work. To what extend do you agree or disagree? 56
- In most countries, prison is an effective solution for the problem. Some people think it is a more effective solution to provide a better education. To what extent do you agree and disagree? 89
- In most countries, prison is an effective solution for the problem. Some people think it is a more effective solution to provide a better education. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 84
- Some people think government should ban dangerous sports, while others think it is people’s fredom to do whatever sports activities they like. Discuss both views and give your opininion. 67
- In many countries, women and men are working full time. Is it, therefore, logical for men and women to share household work. To what extend do you agree or disagree? 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 432, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Furthermore
...ave a flexible and disorganized method. furthermore, individual studying tends to be the to...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, furthermore, if, may, regarding, second, secondly, so, still, thus, well, while, for example, in conclusion, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1743.0 1615.20841683 108% => OK
No of words: 310.0 315.596192385 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.62258064516 5.12529762239 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.19604776685 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93330120911 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 187.0 176.041082164 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.603225806452 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 526.5 506.74238477 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 31.2185351798 49.4020404114 63% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.5 106.682146367 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.1428571429 20.7667163134 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.2142857143 7.06120827912 159% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.313205707739 0.244688304435 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.112880074534 0.084324248473 134% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0709637568011 0.0667982634062 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.213803673745 0.151304729494 141% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0696592314794 0.056905535591 122% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.1 13.0946893788 123% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.32 12.4159519038 123% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.46 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 78.4519038076 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.