The maps below show the centre of a small town called Islip as it is now, and plans for its development.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The given two Islip town center diagrams describe the previous architecture and construction and what new changes will happen once development done.
Firstly, Planned development is about forming dual carriageway around the major part of the town, which is currently having only main road and partial road for school and park. Currently Islip town is very discreet, which is only having main road and shops nearby to it. There are two different ways for park and school, one is from south and another is from east. But in planned development, circular shaped dual carriageway going to form which will be able structure town properly.
Secondly, By implementing planned development, there will be more space to build new bus station and lot of space for two new housing. It also offers proper pedestrians path and dedicated car parking.These features is lacking in current structure of town of Islip. Planned development also take cares of old housing, park and shops. Only thing is school and other part of current housing is outside of dual carriageway.
In a nutshell, Planned development of Islip town center will bring more opportunity for other market and more space to add new needful things. It gives structure to the town.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-15 | wondertran | 78 | view |
| 2019-11-30 | prachirai | 73 | view |
| 2019-11-26 | JiaYanLi | 70 | view |
| 2019-11-23 | bak1995 | 89 | view |
| 2019-11-19 | happyhappy | 73 | view |
- The following is taken from a memo from the advertising director of the Super Screen Movie Production Company. "According to a recent report from our marketing department, during the past year, fewer people attended Super Screen-produced movies than in an 53
- The charts give information about two genres of TV programmes watched by men and women and four different age groups in Australia Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 72
- some people think that the development of technology help to decrease crime and other people think that would encourage crime to discuss both views and give your opinion 56
- The Table below shows the results of a survey that asked 6800 Scottish adults (aged 16 years and over) whether they had taken part in different cultural activities in the past 12 months. 78
- The increasingly rapid pace of life today causes more problems than it solves. 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 158, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'pedestrians'' or 'pedestrian's'?
Suggestion: pedestrians'; pedestrian's
... two new housing. It also offers proper pedestrians path and dedicated car parking.These fe...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 201, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: These
...estrians path and dedicated car parking.These features is lacking in current structur...
^^^^^
Line 9, column 216, Rule ID: AGREEMENT_SENT_START[4]
Message: You should probably use: 'are'.
Suggestion: are
...nd dedicated car parking.These features is lacking in current structure of town of...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, second, secondly, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 7.0 171% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 1.00243902439 399% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 13.0 6.8 191% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 22.0 33.7804878049 65% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 3.97073170732 201% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1049.0 965.302439024 109% => OK
No of words: 203.0 196.424390244 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.16748768473 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.77462671648 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67584284329 2.65546596893 101% => OK
Unique words: 113.0 106.607317073 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.556650246305 0.547539520022 102% => OK
syllable_count: 306.0 283.868780488 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 39.3868291952 43.030603864 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.3636363636 112.824112599 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.4545454545 22.9334400587 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.63636363636 5.23603664747 89% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.09268292683 195% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.160233259418 0.215688989381 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0666067552625 0.103423049105 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0355913799731 0.0843802449381 42% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0995603613238 0.15604864568 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0338418964407 0.0819641961636 41% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 13.2329268293 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 61.2550243902 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.71 11.4140731707 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.72 8.06136585366 96% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 40.7170731707 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.