Some people think that keeping pets is good for children while other think it is dangerous and unhealthy which opinion do you agree with? Discus both options & give example
The importance of the keeping pets is good for children which was always been debatable has now upsurge a lot of arguments in favor and against it. Thus it has ever more controversial. The sustainable influence of imitating celebrates has sparked controversy over the potential of this trend is an integral part of society in recent years. It can be agreed that the upside of imitating celebrates are instrumental indeed. This easy will be elaborate on both assertions and provided a well weighted conclusion.
There are myriad of reason which will further explain this argument but the most preponderant one stems for fact that. Other pivotal aspects this argument is that. Needless to say all this merits keeping pets is good for children in a good stead.
However there are some pitfalls that negative and which can certainly overwhelm the potential influence of this trend of but the most alarming is that. Beside. Hence it is apparent why many are against keeping pets is good for children.
According to the argument aforementioned above one can reach a conclusion that the benefits of keeping pets are good for children are instrumental indeed. Nevertheless the potential drawback should not be overlooked either.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-09-20 | komalpreetsingh | 55 | view |
| 2019-09-20 | komalpreetsingh | 72 | view |
- Some people believe that boarding schools are an excellent option for children, while others disagree. Consider both sides and conclude. 75
- Some people believe that boarding school are an excellent option for children, while other disagree consider both sides and conclude. 55
- Mass Media has changed the way we communicate. It has both positive and negative effects. Give your opinion and discuss both views. 80
- In a cashless society, people use more credit cards. What are the advantages and disadvantages of this practice? 85
- Some people suggest that each family should have one car and not encourage alternative vehicle give you opinion. 75
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 97, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error -- use past participle here: 'upsurged'.
Suggestion: upsurged
...which was always been debatable has now upsurge a lot of arguments in favor and against...
^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 149, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
...t of arguments in favor and against it. Thus it has ever more controversial. The sus...
^^^^
Line 9, column 1, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
...ood for children in a good stead. However there are some pitfalls that negative a...
^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 161, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Hence,
... but the most alarming is that. Beside. Hence it is apparent why many are against kee...
^^^^^
Line 13, column 156, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Nevertheless,
...d for children are instrumental indeed. Nevertheless the potential drawback should not be ov...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, hence, however, look, nevertheless, so, thus, well
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 10.5418719212 171% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 20.9802955665 76% => OK
Preposition: 20.0 31.9359605911 63% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.75862068966 104% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1039.0 1207.87684729 86% => OK
No of words: 200.0 242.827586207 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.195 5.00649968141 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.76060309309 3.92707691288 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8322958885 2.71678728327 104% => OK
Unique words: 111.0 139.433497537 80% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.555 0.580463131201 96% => OK
syllable_count: 318.6 379.143842365 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 4.6157635468 43% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.71428571429 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.65517241379 27% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.5024630542 78% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 41.4846022305 50.4703680194 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 86.5833333333 104.977214359 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.6666666667 20.9669160288 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.58333333333 7.25397266985 63% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.33497536946 94% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 6.9802955665 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 2.75862068966 145% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 2.91625615764 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.196817862045 0.242375264174 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0743805551778 0.0925447433944 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0707866627471 0.071462118173 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.130492574859 0.151781067708 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0203166857909 0.0609392437508 33% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 12.6369458128 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 53.1260098522 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.9458128079 87% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.58 11.5310837438 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.22 8.32886699507 99% => OK
difficult_words: 48.0 55.0591133005 87% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.94827586207 90% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.3980295567 81% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.5123152709 86% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 55.5555555556 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 50.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.