Educators should find out what students want included in the curriculum and then offer it to them.
The educational issues are very controversial yet have a great importance for a society in order to thrive. One of these issues is the curriculum that students must go through before stepping into life. Until the latest decade, educators and authorities had the only power to build a curriculum for their students, who are the ones going through the education but do not have a saying about it. Indisputably, thoughts and interests of children must be understood by the institutions to give them opportunities. However, educators should prepare the core curriculum only by themselves and provide variety of elective courses on the interests of students.
To begin with, if educators were to offer what students wanted, it would be a warzone with different interests leading no productive results in terms of the education. While educators have the experience to understand what students must learn, children have whimsical interests with no goals. For example, students watching Jackie Chan or Martian want to be a fighter or an astronaut for a short time. Understanding of these two professions are not based on the real life experiences or detailed instructions. When they confront the requirements of being an astronaut, they could give up. Educators are aware that it would not be efficient to follow these interests.
In addition to that, education is not only about the technical details of the field of studies, they are also the appreciation of life. The purpose of the education must be teaching the values, developing stimulated intellect, showing how to seek out opportunities and contributing the growth of the society. Nevertheless, students who are not able to recognize the aspect of life, will censure these kinds of classes in order to not get bored or just to be seen as if they know the aspects. For instance, it is unbelievable that how successful or reach people are so rude and lacking social polish. The president of United States, Donald Trump is the remarkable example of this subject. Both of these people graduated from great colleges and became the head of two powerful countries. Yet, they do not know how to behave and act in front of the whole world.
On the opposite side, some say that students can be motivated to learn when they are interested in the class. Still, the motivation comes through many ways, which educators can use it as an advantage to get the most efficient results. Lately, there are student projects, contests and field trips to both motivate the student and teach them manners and technical details. One of them is CANSAT, which is a satellite build project for students. Through this process, students get interested while building the real systems with real sensors and software. Moreover, in the end, they have a sense of what it is like to be an engineer or a project manager. Again, if we would ask them, they would rather sit in the class and watch a movie about satellites but not to go through the project, which seems as an arduous task for them.
In conclusion, curriculum must be decided by the experts, who have an understanding of the students and the field of studies. Asking children what they want mostly causes the curriculum to be lazy, easy and unproductive because kids do not know the importance aspects of the education. Still, some argue that students can be more inclined to learn if the curriculum was intriguing for them.
- Educators should find out what students want included in the curriculum and then offer it to them. 62
- "To serve the housing needs of our students, Buckingham College should build a number of new dormitories. Buckingham's enrollment is growing and, based on current trends, will double over the next 50 years, thus making existing dormitory space i 69
- Society should make efforts to save endangered species only if the potential extinction of those species is the result of human activities. 58
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, moreover, nevertheless, so, still, while, for example, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 30.0 19.5258426966 154% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 12.4196629213 121% => OK
Conjunction : 24.0 14.8657303371 161% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.3162921348 124% => OK
Pronoun: 37.0 33.0505617978 112% => OK
Preposition: 80.0 58.6224719101 136% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 12.9106741573 93% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2895.0 2235.4752809 130% => OK
No of words: 582.0 442.535393258 132% => OK
Chars per words: 4.97422680412 5.05705443957 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.91168771031 4.55969084622 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79941362054 2.79657885939 100% => OK
Unique words: 282.0 215.323595506 131% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.484536082474 0.4932671777 98% => OK
syllable_count: 895.5 704.065955056 127% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 6.24550561798 112% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.10617977528 161% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.38483146067 160% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 28.0 20.2370786517 138% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 23.0359550562 87% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.0749766687 60.3974514979 55% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 103.392857143 118.986275619 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.7857142857 23.4991977007 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.78571428571 5.21951772744 92% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 7.80617977528 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 16.0 10.2758426966 156% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.83258426966 145% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.228093922858 0.243740707755 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0599769880597 0.0831039109588 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0445825129132 0.0758088955206 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.135692498771 0.150359130593 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0438948638871 0.0667264976115 66% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 14.1392134831 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 48.8420337079 122% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 12.1743820225 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.55 12.1639044944 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.21 8.38706741573 98% => OK
difficult_words: 132.0 100.480337079 131% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 11.8971910112 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 11.2143820225 89% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.7820224719 85% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 62.5 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.75 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.