Many people today, especially in the developed world, are choosing to have fewer children, or none at all.
Why is this happening, and do you think it is a good trend?
In recent decades, the trend of having no children or fewer babies in developed countries has been receiving a great deal of public attention from the communities. Although there are a whole host of reasons for these options, some drawbacks are still more significant.
There are many reasons why most people have no interest of becoming parents or decided to have fewer babies. First, since they have a tendency to spend most of their time on their career development, they refuse to become parents. In fact, they take a huge responsibility for their current jobs, spending more time with higher commitment, which helps them to get higher positions at work and have no time for babies. Second, these individuals have a desire to bring up their children with the best quality of education, they opt for having fewer babies. It means they are likely to prosinating parenthood to save up enough money and accumulate fundamental knowledge in raising children, therefore they usually have fewer children compared with others.
On the other hand, this trend has some downsides that should be taken into consideration. First, this can be detrimental to the national economy. It means this trend can increase the elderly population rate and result in the shortage of labor force at the younger ages, thus making more burdens on economy and medical care policies for elderly people, for instance. Second, by having one son in a family, it can be attributed to lack of family bond. For example, children are one of the main factors that stick husbands and wifes, therefore, having a few babies can lead to increase the divorce rate.
In conclusion, the problem that couples are not keen on becoming the parenthood or choose to have fewer children appears many drawbacks. By considering many pros and cons carefully, they will have the best decision for themselves.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-05-11 | jagrit sharma | 73 | view |
| 2021-05-11 | jagrit sharma | 73 | view |
- The bar chart shows the scores of teams A, B and C over four differentseasons. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the mainfeatures and make comparisons where relevant. 56
- The bar chart shows the scores of teams A, B and C over four differentseasons. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the mainfeatures and make comparisons where relevant. 56
- Percentage of UK people who consumed daily recommended amount of fruit and vegetable in 2002, 2006 and 2010. 67
- Some people think that a huge amount of time and money is spent on the protection of wild animals, and that this money could be better spent on the human population. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion? 84
- The charts below show the results of a questionnaire that asked visitors to the Parkway Hotel how they rated the hotel's customer service. The same questionnaire was given to 100 guests in the years 2005 and 2010. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 192, Rule ID: THERE_RE_MANY[3]
Message: Possible agreement error. Did you mean 'hosts'?
Suggestion: hosts
...communities. Although there are a whole host of reasons for these options, some draw...
^^^^
Line 13, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...lead to increase the divorce rate. In conclusion, the problem that couples ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, second, so, still, therefore, thus, for example, for instance, in conclusion, in fact, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1568.0 1615.20841683 97% => OK
No of words: 309.0 315.596192385 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.07443365696 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1926597562 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63594567308 2.80592935109 94% => OK
Unique words: 173.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.559870550162 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 492.3 506.74238477 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 5.43587174349 184% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.5876034886 49.4020404114 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.0 106.682146367 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0714285714 20.7667163134 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.57142857143 7.06120827912 121% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.215573467787 0.244688304435 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0810655174553 0.084324248473 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0577845096677 0.0667982634062 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.132516701795 0.151304729494 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0269897596475 0.056905535591 47% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.0946893788 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.13 12.4159519038 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.66 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 78.4519038076 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.