Nowadays more and more young people hold the important positions in the government. Some people think that is a good thing while others argue that it is not suitable. Discuss both views and give your own opinion
Recently, there has been a growing tendency that young people take on crucial responsibilities in government. While part of society expresses concern about this trend, I would argue that younger authority system may make more promising contributions.
On the one hand, there are psychological and realistic reasons making young governors unsuitable for exercising authority that skeptics may argue against. Realistically, it is widely acknowledged that younger people tend to be less patient and acquire inadequate experiences, which play paramount importance in performing national duties. Without enough real challenges and training, young leaders are incompetent and more likely to mistakenly make decisions that cause appalling consequences. Psychologically, particularly in Eastern countries, prejudices among older government members about youngers may be a root of dissonant voices and even intrinsic instability. Furthermore, stereotype also exists in parts of society, wherein many people generally hesitate to be lectured or controlled by young authorities, which eventually leads to discontent and disintegrating.
On the other hand, convincing reasoning can be provided to support younger leaders in government, because of the wide range of valuable characteristics. It is undoubted that older governors are conservative-leaning, while lower age counterparts are highly sensitive and adaptive with swift changes in the modern world. Moreover, youngers are now equipped with contemporary knowledge, accompanied by the fact that they are quick learners, which may be weighed against their lack of experience. All of these can be considerably useful in term of the country is confronting modernization and globalization, in which governments have to consistently adopt new policies and strategies. Finally, provided that young and old authority members are equally qualified, young members would be more appropriate because of their stamina and the period of time they are expected to continuously devote their effort to society.
In conclusion, it seems to me that despite older leaders are more experienced, younger leaders show enormous potential and are more suitable for holding central positions in authority.
- Nowadays there is a trend that reports of media focus on problems and emergencies rather than positive development Some people think it is harmful to individuals and to society To what extent do you agree or disagree 80
- Maintaining public libraries is a waste of money since computer technology can replace their functions. Do you agree or disagree? 82
- Advertisements are becoming more and more common in everyday life Is it a positive or negative development 89
- Some people feel that manufacturers and supermarkets have the responsibility to reduce the amount of packaging of goods While others argue that customers should avoid buying goods with a lot of packaging 78
- People who read of pleasure have better imagination and language skills than those who prefer watching TV To what extent do you agree 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 833, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...priate because of their stamina and the period of time they are expected to continuously devot...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, furthermore, if, may, moreover, so, while, in conclusion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 13.1623246493 160% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 7.30460921844 178% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1916.0 1615.20841683 119% => OK
No of words: 321.0 315.596192385 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.96884735202 5.12529762239 116% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23278547379 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.38820243812 2.80592935109 121% => OK
Unique words: 201.0 176.041082164 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.626168224299 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 600.3 506.74238477 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.60771543086 118% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 29.0502523184 49.4020404114 59% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 147.384615385 106.682146367 138% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.6923076923 20.7667163134 119% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.30769230769 7.06120827912 103% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.170363068512 0.244688304435 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0591768416606 0.084324248473 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0438131648682 0.0667982634062 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.117944777136 0.151304729494 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0384223126121 0.056905535591 68% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.0 13.0946893788 145% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 21.74 50.2224549098 43% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.2 11.3001002004 143% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 17.64 12.4159519038 142% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.83 8.58950901804 126% => OK
difficult_words: 122.0 78.4519038076 156% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.78957915832 128% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.