Laws should be flexible enough to take account of various circumstances, times,and places.
It aroused a hot discussion in zhihu, a Chinese Quora that Zhang Koukou was sentenced to death because he killed three criminals who abused and killed his mother 20 years ago in front of him when he was just a child and escaped from deserved punishment through bribery. And some people thought the death penalty was too severe though he violated the law. The statement argues that laws should be flexible enough to take different kinds of circumstances, times, and places into consideration. I mostly agree this statement because while laws should be flexible enough in theory and indeed progress in that direction, they can never be perfectly complete in practice.
Before elaborating on my reasoning, I would like share some of my understanding of laws. Justice and equality which are no doubt the core of the laws are indeed based on people's values. As we all know, the public's values changes from the ancient times to modern times, from eastern countries to western countries and can not come to an agreement.
Laws should take a new circumstance into consideration if it just benefits some kind of group and do no harm or little harm to other groups. It is a particularly salient example that many countries and areas have passed the laws to recognize the third gender. Obvious is the fact that this group almost does no harm to this society and they just want to get recognized and live as others. Besides, it's also a huge progress of human civilization to be more tolerant with differences. So why don't laws give them deserved respect considering that the goal of laws is justice and equality.
However, laws can never be flexible enough to take account of all cases because people's values vary and new cases appear as the time goes on. For instance, it is hard for an area where hostile religious group are the major residents like the Middle East to pass a law to constrain and protect all of them because they discriminate against each other because of their religious values. As is often the case, a law considered as a fair and judical one by one religious group can be criticized by another group according to their own values. What is more, there is always new case as the time goes on, which is beyond the legislature's prediction. Foe example, Chinese government would never know that it would abolish the one-child policy some day several decades ago when it passed a law to ban more than two children in a family. For the same reason, who knows what will happen in the future and how will the laws changes with times.
To sum up, I mostly agree the statement because enough flexible laws to protect the justice and equality of more people is the goal we are working for whereas laws can not be perfectly complete as the result of the limitation of times and differences of values.
- Universities should require every student take a variety of courses outside the student's field of study. 66
- People's behavior is largely determined by forces not of their own making. 66
- Some people believe that college students should consider their own talents and interests when choosing a field of a study. Others believe that base their choice of a field of study on the availability of jobs in that field. 66
- Governments shuold offer a free university education to any students who have been admitted to a university but who cannot offer the tuition 66
- In any field of endeavor, it is impossible to make a significant contribution without first being influenced by past achievement within that field. 79
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 399, Rule ID: IT_IS[6]
Message: Did you mean 'it's' (='it is') instead of 'its' (possessive pronoun)?
Suggestion: it's; it is
...recognized and live as others. Besides, its also a huge progress of human civilizat...
^^^
Line 9, column 408, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[3]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'huge progress'.
Suggestion: huge progress
...d and live as others. Besides, its also a huge progress of human civilization to be more tolera...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 491, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
... more tolerant with differences. So why dont laws give them deserved respect conside...
^^^^
Line 13, column 547, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...p according to their own values. What is more, there is always new case as the ti...
^^
Line 13, column 621, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'legislatures'' or 'legislature's'?
Suggestion: legislatures'; legislature's
...s the time goes on, which is beyond the legislatures prediction. Foe example, Chinese govern...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, however, if, so, third, whereas, while, as to, for instance, kind of, no doubt, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 23.0 19.5258426966 118% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 12.4196629213 105% => OK
Conjunction : 19.0 14.8657303371 128% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.3162921348 124% => OK
Pronoun: 36.0 33.0505617978 109% => OK
Preposition: 59.0 58.6224719101 101% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 12.9106741573 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2326.0 2235.4752809 104% => OK
No of words: 492.0 442.535393258 111% => OK
Chars per words: 4.72764227642 5.05705443957 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.70967865282 4.55969084622 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.54682177301 2.79657885939 91% => OK
Unique words: 248.0 215.323595506 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.50406504065 0.4932671777 102% => OK
syllable_count: 734.4 704.065955056 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 6.24550561798 128% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.2370786517 94% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 23.0359550562 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.8380126483 60.3974514979 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.421052632 118.986275619 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.8947368421 23.4991977007 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.47368421053 5.21951772744 105% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 7.80617977528 64% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 10.2758426966 107% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 5.13820224719 117% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.262314213404 0.243740707755 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0852173616502 0.0831039109588 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.104443078819 0.0758088955206 138% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.14363249064 0.150359130593 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0688177050769 0.0667264976115 103% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 14.1392134831 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 48.8420337079 112% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 12.1743820225 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.45 12.1639044944 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.09 8.38706741573 96% => OK
difficult_words: 100.0 100.480337079 100% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.8971910112 109% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 11.2143820225 107% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 83.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.