Creative artists should always be given the freedom to express their own ideas (in words, pictures, music or film) in whichever way they wish. There should be no government restrictions on what they do.
To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion?
Art is the mirror of an artist`s soul and mind, and limitations cast a shadow on that mirror. It means to portray a new issue or an old one from a new point of view, so art is the ability of creation. No creative art will appear or live long while governmental restrictions are governing. However, absolute freedom will be problematic when society is not artistically mature. Hence, the government should act only as a regulatory body who tries to keep a balance among different sections of the society.
First and foremost, governmental restraints will result in partiality of artworks` assessment and exhibition. Under this circumstance, the arts take priority depending on the extent of their adherence to the rules or social standards not the extent of their innovation or artistic value. Thus, a poor diversity of the arts will limit artistic arena of a country that affects both people and artists. The repetitive pattern of artworks makes people disappointed and uninterested; fewer writings are read since no various content have been introduced and fewer artistic events are welcomed since copied productions have exhausted audiences. On the other hand, artists being banned from presenting their ingenious perspectives will look for a new channel. Immigration is mostly the only way which can lead to a decline in artworks quality due to economic or mental problems of immigration. Similarly, inside the country, the quality of art education will fall because bounded artistic minds are in the educational positions. This is a crisis situation where art growth would be a matter of profound concern.
Furthermore, artists have a duty of illustrating truths in the most attractive way. They are responsible to make impression, inform all or give a solution about different types of issues like beauties, discriminations, pleasures, pains or everything existing within the heart of the society. In effect, every creative art has a unique message from society to society. For instance, an Iranian photographer took innovatory photos during Iran-Iraq war including Iranian baby soldiers and thoughtful scenes of violence and kindness between two parties. His pictures were heavily censored in his home country by government that made him to publish them in the second country after immigration. The end of the war is thirty one years old by now but as time passes every single photo of him is still clarifying new aspects of war; aspects which are being denied by authorities or are being forgotten by people. If this original mind had not been allowed to be in the front line, the real face of war would never become revealed.
Benefiting society, art also has a dangerous face. It can be offensive to some while being inspired to others. Governments might prefer applying pressure and constraint on arts to prevent any probable disturbance in the society or any likely criticism of itself. Undoubtedly, this is not an occasion on which a modern society can be based. Instead, peaceful remedies are necessary to be used: artists should clarify their purpose to all, especially those of whom that is predicted to take the artwork as insult; governments must be aware that the arts are going to be exhibited in where and to whom and make security for everyone; and all parts of the society need to be mature enough in order to understand that freedom of expression is an essential right for every individual. A modern society has deeply realized that the best reply to an artwork is an artwork, correspondingly.
In conclusion, governmental restrictions kill both creativity and art. In contrast, absolute freedom causes anarchy. In order to neither confine inventiveness nor making disorder, governments would be better behaving as a regulator who promises freedom of expression for all in safety and put its effort into growing awareness of whole society.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-17 | Shidbi | 73 | view |
| 2020-01-10 | pateldhruv1708 | 73 | view |
| 2020-01-03 | mone49 | 73 | view |
| 2019-12-19 | Stephen Halolo | 78 | view |
| 2019-12-13 | jignesh.ghelani | 78 | view |
- In many countries schools have severe problems with student behavior.What do you think are the causes of this? What solutions can you suggest? 89
- In many countries schools have severe problems with student behavior. What do you think are the causes of this? What solutions can you suggest? 89
- Creative artists should always be given the freedom to express their own ideas (in words, pictures, music or film) in whichever way they wish. There should be no government restrictions on what they do.To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opi 73
- In many countries schools have severe problems with student behavior. What do you think are the causes of this? What solutions can you suggest? 84
- Happiness is considered very important in life.Why is it difficult to define?What factors are important in achieving happiness? 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 10, column 118, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...trast, absolute freedom causes anarchy. In order to neither confine inventiveness ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, hence, however, if, look, second, similarly, so, still, thus, while, for instance, in conclusion, in contrast, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 37.0 13.1623246493 281% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 7.85571142285 216% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 26.0 10.4138276553 250% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 17.0 7.30460921844 233% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 87.0 41.998997996 207% => Less preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 18.0 8.3376753507 216% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 3259.0 1615.20841683 202% => Less number of characters wanted.
No of words: 630.0 315.596192385 200% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.17301587302 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 5.00997013923 4.20363070211 119% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.95962969159 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 347.0 176.041082164 197% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.550793650794 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 1040.4 506.74238477 205% => syllable counts are too long.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 9.0 2.52805611222 356% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 29.0 16.0721442886 180% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 77.4781469708 49.4020404114 157% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.379310345 106.682146367 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.724137931 20.7667163134 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.48275862069 7.06120827912 78% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 12.0 3.9879759519 301% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.189820895863 0.244688304435 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0475608665737 0.084324248473 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0393198576212 0.0667982634062 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.107876801011 0.151304729494 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0194012133306 0.056905535591 34% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.71 12.4159519038 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.26 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 183.0 78.4519038076 233% => Less difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.