Those who see their ideas through, regardless of doubts or criticism others may express, are the ones who tend to leave a lasting legacy.
Ideas can change the world. Every person has their own vision, to make this vision a reality, they have to pursue their ideas no matter who discredits it. I strongly agree with the author that one should implement their ideas even if it is not accepted by others.
For instance, Arsene Wenger, former coach and manager of Arsenal football club, had the idea of playing tiki-taka football. He was new to the English premier league, which demands physicality rather than technique. Wenger built a team full of great players like Henry, Bergkamp, etc., and challenged the media that he'd go one full season undefeated by playing beautiful football. Some criticized him, others made fun of him, but Wenger did not give up on this and proved everyone wrong in 2003-04 season by becoming 'the Invincibles'. It was his idea of playing from the back, quick one-two passing, famously known as 'the Arsenal way of playing' still remembered by many.
Secondly, Gandhi who is also known as the father of the nation in India, was one of the many freedom fighters who fought bravely against the British rule in India. While many other patriots followed the path of fighting with guns and other weapons, Gandhi opted to do marches and protests. Gandhi's idea was to get freedom without causing any harm to the people. Freedom fighters like Subash Chandra bose did not like this idea and they tried to get freedom in their own way, but failed to do so. Ultimately Gandhi was able to free Indians from British rule. He is still remembered throughout the world, many idolize him, even practice Gandhi's way of living style.
Sometimes we do need to take suggestions from others in pursuing an idea. If the idea is not feasible, we should not consider to take it forward and cause more damage. Like waging a war against neighboring countries even though they're causing troubles.
With all the above examples, it is evident that people who pursued an idea, through thick and thin, has shown us from time to time that they have left a huge legacy in the history. So I strongly believe that, those who have ignored all the criticism thrown to see through their idea have become legends in their respective fields.
- Science and technology will one day solve all of society's problem. 50
- Understanding the past is of little use to those in current positions of leadership. 16
- "Because the future will be dominated by technology, we must make four years of computer programming mandatory for all high school students. If our students take these classes, they’ll all be able to get high-paying programming jobs and lead fulfil 53
- Undergraduate students majoring in Business or in the Sciences should not be required to take any courses in the Humanities since those courses won’t benefit their future careers. 58
- Those who see their ideas through, regardless of doubts or criticism others may express, are the ones who tend to leave a lasting legacy. 58
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 316, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: he'd
...mp, etc., and challenged the media that hed go one full season undefeated by playin...
^^^
Line 13, column 118, Rule ID: ADMIT_ENJOY_VB[3]
Message: This verb is used with the gerund form: 'consider taking'.
Suggestion: consider taking
...the idea is not feasible, we should not consider to take it forward and cause more damage. Like ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 229, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: they're
...ainst neighboring countries even though theyre causing troubles. With all the abo...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, second, secondly, so, still, while, as to, for instance
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 19.5258426966 51% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 12.4196629213 32% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 14.8657303371 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.3162921348 97% => OK
Pronoun: 34.0 33.0505617978 103% => OK
Preposition: 54.0 58.6224719101 92% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 12.9106741573 15% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1826.0 2235.4752809 82% => OK
No of words: 379.0 442.535393258 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.81794195251 5.05705443957 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.41224685777 4.55969084622 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.30988435873 2.79657885939 83% => OK
Unique words: 221.0 215.323595506 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.583113456464 0.4932671777 118% => OK
syllable_count: 549.9 704.065955056 78% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 6.24550561798 128% => OK
Article: 0.0 4.99550561798 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.77640449438 169% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.2370786517 94% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 23.0359550562 82% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 39.078300544 60.3974514979 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.1052631579 118.986275619 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.9473684211 23.4991977007 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.68421052632 5.21951772744 71% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 10.2758426966 97% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.228662410084 0.243740707755 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0636353202898 0.0831039109588 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0621992429988 0.0758088955206 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.127553364893 0.150359130593 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0674921538303 0.0667264976115 101% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.2 14.1392134831 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 48.8420337079 124% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 12.1743820225 78% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.68 12.1639044944 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.25 8.38706741573 98% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 100.480337079 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.8971910112 63% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 11.2143820225 86% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.7820224719 85% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.