Some people think that children with different abilities should be taught together while some think that intelligent children should be given special training or taught separately. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
People's attitudes towards whether talented children should be taught with other children are different. While some of them think that they should be taught separately, my opinion is that talents should have courses with other children and I will analyse it in this essay.
It is understandable that people think children with special abilities should be solely taught. Firstly, if geniuses are taught with other less-talented ones, their special abilities cannot fully exert, which would be a huge pity. For example, if a child who is extremely good at painting but not been sent to a special painting class, his merit might not be fulfilled and eventually he is likely to become mediocre. Besides, an unstreamed class with children in different levels cannot ensure the quality of knowledge imparting, the teacher may repeat several times for those less-talented pupils and this will be a waste of time for those eminent ones. This would cause low-efficiency in a class, which also be a waste of resource.
However, the aim of education should not only focus on pursuing high academic scores, but also form well-rounded personalities. Children who are not excellent at learning may also have other advantages, which is worthy for those talented ones to learn from. In order to improve children's social skills, it is reasonable to mix them in the same class. This can also encourage the talented children to help others in terms of learning. Furthermore, being taught solely may also lead to some psychological problems for those talented children. For example, some children become introvert or even socialphobia due to attending separated class and this is definitely adverse for their future development. Therefore, it is acceptable to build up some elective courses for schools to cater for those talented students to have further and more specialised learning.
In conclusion, for the sake of children's healthier growing up both physically and mentally, they should not been taught or trained separately. But it is appropriate for them to choose specialised electives to achieve their talents.
- In some countries the role of a mother differs in some ways from that of a father Why do you think these differences exist How might parental roles develop in the future 87
- The natural resources such as oil, forest sand fresh water are being consumed at an alarming rate. What problems does it cause? How can we solve these problems? 84
- Human activities have negative effects on plant and animal species. Some people think it is too late to do anything about this problem. Others believe that effective measures can be taken to improve this situation. Discuss both views and give your opi 73
- Some people think it is easier for adults to learn practical skills (such as computer skills) by themselves while others believe it is better to learn with a teacher in classroom. Discuss both sides and give your own opinion. 73
- The government should spend money in promoting sport and art in school rather sponsoring professional sports and art events in communities To what extent do you agree or disagree 92
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, first, firstly, furthermore, however, if, may, so, therefore, well, while, even so, for example, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 13.1623246493 167% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 7.85571142285 216% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 24.0651302605 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.3376753507 24% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1778.0 1615.20841683 110% => OK
No of words: 336.0 315.596192385 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.29166666667 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.28139028586 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84466521429 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 181.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.53869047619 0.561755894193 96% => OK
syllable_count: 547.2 506.74238477 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.035699114 49.4020404114 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.125 106.682146367 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0 20.7667163134 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.125 7.06120827912 115% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 8.67935871743 150% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.359324647934 0.244688304435 147% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.14406991172 0.084324248473 171% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.148105023341 0.0667982634062 222% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.258172180649 0.151304729494 171% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.129208301485 0.056905535591 227% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.0946893788 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.4 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.91 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 78.4519038076 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.