The natural resources such as oil, forest sand fresh water are being consumed at an alarming rate. What problems does it cause? How can we solve these problems?
Humans are confronted with an unprecedented resource crisis since the over-consumption of fossil fuel, lumber and fresh water in the process of development. This essay will analyse those possible reasons and discuss feasible solutions towards these problems.
It is undeniably that from the very beginning of industrial age, the natural resources have been decreasing constantly. For one thing, the industrialisation result in the development of manufactures and transportation, which require huge amount of fossil fuel such as petrol and coal. In order to maintain the economic operation, people have to over-exploit those natural resources. Furthermore, the growing desire of items made from wood lead to huge area of deforestation. This phenomenon is more severe in developing countries who rely on exporting lumber for their domestic economy. Finally, the global overpopulation and industrial pollution have gradually made the clean fresh water become scarce, which caused the water shortage in many regions.
However, I think there still remains some practical strategies to tackle with these problems. Firstly, the utilisation of renewable resources such as solar or electrical energy should be promoted. It is an optimistic tendency that more automobile producers begin to apply rechargeable batteries in transpiration. Besides, governments should introduce more strict laws to deal with deforestation and water pollution, such as imposing lumber tax or punishing the sewage discharge. In addition, individuals should also take actions to save natural resources. Each citizen uses a piece of A4 paper less every single day, for example, then huge area of forest will be reserved.
In conclusion, the accelerating industrialisation and overpopulation are the main causes of the consumption of natural resources. To solve these problems and restore our environment, all of our human beings should commonly take the responsibilities.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-10-10 | oceanyang | 84 | view |
| 2019-09-04 | pateldhruv272 | 89 | view |
| 2018-02-04 | shrey250021 | 67 | view |
| 2017-08-02 | Dhruvil_Patel | 90 | view |
- The leaders or directors of organizations are often older people, but some people say that young people can also be a leader. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 89
- Some people think the main benefit of international cooperation is in the protection of the environment while others think that the main benefits are in the world business Discuss both views and give your opinion 84
- People still value artists in the age of advanced science and technology. Why do you think this is? Are arts as important as science and technology? 73
- Some people say that travelling abroad is necessary to get knowledge about other countries while others suggest that TV and the internet can also help people know about foreign countries Discuss both views and give your opinion 89
- The natural resources such as oil, forest sand fresh water are being consumed at an alarming rate. What problems does it cause? How can we solve these problems? 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 600, Rule ID: EVERYDAY_EVERY_DAY[3]
Message: 'Everyday' is an adjective. Did you mean 'every day'?
Suggestion: every day
...h citizen uses a piece of A4 paper less everyday, for example, then huge area of forest ...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, finally, first, firstly, furthermore, however, so, still, then, for example, i think, in addition, in conclusion, such as, for one thing
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 18.0 8.3376753507 216% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1660.0 1615.20841683 103% => OK
No of words: 285.0 315.596192385 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.82456140351 5.12529762239 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10876417139 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.33075800792 2.80592935109 119% => OK
Unique words: 183.0 176.041082164 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.642105263158 0.561755894193 114% => OK
syllable_count: 528.3 506.74238477 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.60771543086 118% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 27.7600629277 49.4020404114 56% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 103.75 106.682146367 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.8125 20.7667163134 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.4375 7.06120827912 134% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.196272040804 0.244688304435 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0534761072331 0.084324248473 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0388569282385 0.0667982634062 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.115607199733 0.151304729494 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0295796652468 0.056905535591 52% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 13.0946893788 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 28.84 50.2224549098 57% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.5 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.18 12.4159519038 130% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.02 8.58950901804 117% => OK
difficult_words: 100.0 78.4519038076 127% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.