More and more people are using a lot of online language translation apps. Are there more advantages or more disadvantages of such services?
With the advancement of technology, language translation apps are becoming popular. An increasing number of people are using such apps and I believe, benefits of those apps are much greater compared to drawbacks.
Firstly, if we consider the advantages, most of the people are depending on their mobile devices to get their daily tasks done. Earlier, to translate something either we had to refer a paper-based dictionary and do it manually or had to get the professional service from a certified translator. However, currently, these apps are providing an extremely easy and reliable solution for people to do their translation work by themselves. Moreover, these services are equipped with more than one language and which gives people an option to use these apps to learn languages as well. In fact, these days’ people are looking for quick solutions for everything and therefore, quick translation of any language has given a lot of benefits for people in different areas such as tourism, business and communication.
Secondly, turning in to the drawbacks, we should take into account that the accuracy of the result of these apps is still doubtful. The reason for this is most of the content are developing by people without any formal qualification in languages or linguistic science. As an example, there can be different meaning for the same word in different languages. The result should elaborate on these differences to give the exact meaning but rather most of the apps are just giving a general meaning. If someone needed to do some professional or academic task using such an app, the accuracy of the output would not be guaranteed. In contrast, this kind of issues can only be resolved by based on user inputs and updating the contents accordingly. In other words, unless people regularly use such apps and report problems which they encountered, apps cannot be upgraded. Therefore, people should use these apps to make them better in the future.
In conclusion, although there are some content-related issues are still there in such apps, the benefits people getting are outweighing the drawbacks.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-10-22 | virtualpathum | 73 | view |
- Some people prefer to raise children in the cities while others believe that children should be raised in the countryside Discuss both views and give your opinion 87
- In the past museums stored information about culture and history However nowadays this information can be found through the Internet and therefore there is no need for museums Do you agree or disagree with this view 72
- You are having a graduation party next Saturday night You have invited 50 people to celebrate at an outdoor barbecue evening which may continue into late into the night Write a letter to your elderly neighbour In your letter explain what will be happening 83
- Some people think that it is beneficial for children to do paid work, while others think that it can be harmful for children.What are the advantages and disadvantages of children doing paid work? 61
- In many countries some students live with their families while studying but other students prefer to attend universities in other cities Do the benefits of living away from home outweigh the disadvantages 87
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 60, Rule ID: PROGRESSIVE_VERBS[1]
Message: This verb is normally not used in the progressive form. Try a simple form instead.
...ider the advantages, most of the people are depending on their mobile devices to get their da...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 572, Rule ID: LEARN_NNNNS_ON_DO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'to'?
Suggestion: to
...on to use these apps to learn languages as well. In fact, these days' people ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, but, first, firstly, however, if, look, moreover, second, secondly, so, still, therefore, well, as to, in conclusion, in contrast, in fact, kind of, such as, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1792.0 1615.20841683 111% => OK
No of words: 345.0 315.596192385 109% => OK
Chars per words: 5.19420289855 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.3097767484 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88517784681 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 184.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.533333333333 0.561755894193 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 564.3 506.74238477 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.0918437817 49.4020404114 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.0 106.682146367 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5625 20.7667163134 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.5625 7.06120827912 164% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.191087287543 0.244688304435 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0594517214006 0.084324248473 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0581771517692 0.0667982634062 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.114179455505 0.151304729494 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.054958064241 0.056905535591 97% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.82 12.4159519038 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.61 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 78.4519038076 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.