The graph below shows the number of hours per day on average that children spent watching television.
The following graph gives information about how many hours a day children lose there leisure time in front of a TV set between 1950 and 2010 and is measured in hours a regular day.
Overall, it can be seen that despite some fluctuations the graph shoved a high increase during the given time.
To begin, in 1950 amount of hours which the children spend opposite TV screen was a little namely stood at approximately 10-15 minutes a day. But from this point onwards it began to increase dramatically in the next 10 years also it reached about a half-hour a day. Thereafter the number of hours which watched TV by children rose shockingly from 1960 to about 1975 and it stood at 4 hours a day. After that, the figure fluctuated between 1975 and 1995 also it reached its highest point (more than 4 hours a day), from this downwards the graph started to decrease gradually until the end of the period.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-10-04 | mamun25 | 61 | view |
| 2021-07-24 | sharad patel | 78 | view |
| 2021-06-02 | Ismoilkhon | view | |
| 2021-03-20 | Cuberates | 84 | view |
| 2021-02-28 | lili__nhnh | view |
- The graph below shows the sales of children's books, adult fiction and educational books between 2002 and 2006 in one country. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant. 73
- Some people think that government wasting money on the arts, and this money could be spent elsewhere. To what extend do you agree or disagree? 73
- Do you agree that the advantages cars bring outweigh the disadvantages
- The line graph below shows the population size, birth rate and the death rate of England and Wales from 1700 to 2000. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant. 73
- Thesalesofthreedifferentkindsofbooksbetween2002and2006 11
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
The following graph gives information ab...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...d is measured in hours a regular day. Overall, it can be seen that despite som...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... high increase during the given time. To begin, in 1950 amount of hours which ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 279, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thereafter,
...lso it reached about a half-hour a day. Thereafter the number of hours which watched TV by...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 530, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...est point more than 4 hours a day, from this downwards the graph started to decrease...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 10.0 5.60731707317 178% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 27.0 33.7804878049 80% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 740.0 965.302439024 77% => OK
No of words: 162.0 196.424390244 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.56790123457 4.92477711251 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.56762134501 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.46515883424 2.65546596893 93% => OK
Unique words: 98.0 106.607317073 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.604938271605 0.547539520022 110% => OK
syllable_count: 211.5 283.868780488 75% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 22.4926829268 120% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 32.8908126314 43.030603864 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.333333333 112.824112599 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.0 22.9334400587 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.16666666667 5.23603664747 41% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 5.0 1.69756097561 295% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.253793732381 0.215688989381 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.130098690879 0.103423049105 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0742892957098 0.0843802449381 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.15417633736 0.15604864568 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0804911756151 0.0819641961636 98% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.2329268293 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 69.45 61.2550243902 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.52 11.4140731707 83% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.9 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 30.0 40.7170731707 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.9970731707 116% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.