The replacement of paper money
The importance of replacement of paper money which was always debatable has now become more controversial with many people claiming that it is beneficial while others reject these notion. The substantial influence of this trend has sparkler the controversy over the potential impact in recent years. In my opinion, the proposition appears to be more rational. This essay will further elaborate both positive and negative effects of this trend and thus will lead to a logical conclusion.
There are myriad of reasons which will further explain this argument but the most preponderant one stems from the fact that the credit card is safer than cash. Another pivotal aspect of this argument is that credit card is easy to carry. Needless to say all these merits stand in a good stead.
However there are some pitfalls that negate these arguments and which can certainly overwhelm the potential influence this trend but one of the most alarming one is that if we lost credit card we lost all money.Hence , it is apparent why many are against this trend
According to the argument aforementioned above one can reach to a conclusion that the benefits of replacement of paper money are instrumental indeed.Nevertheless it potential drawback should not be overlooked either.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 175, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this notion' or 'these notions'?
Suggestion: this notion; these notions
...at it is beneficial while others reject these notion. The substantial influence of this tren...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 384, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e more rational. This essay will further elaborate both positive and negative eff...
^^
Line 3, column 69, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...which will further explain this argument but the most preponderant one stems from...
^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
...l these merits stand in a good stead. However there are some pitfalls that negate the...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 118, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...tainly overwhelm the potential influence this trend but one of the most alarming ...
^^
Line 5, column 213, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Hence
...f we lost credit card we lost all money.Hence , it is apparent why many are against t...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 218, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...lost credit card we lost all money.Hence , it is apparent why many are against thi...
^^
Line 5, column 267, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...apparent why many are against this trend According to the argument aforementioned...
^^^^
Line 7, column 150, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Nevertheless
... of paper money are instrumental indeed.Nevertheless it potential drawback should not be ove...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 150, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Nevertheless,
... of paper money are instrumental indeed.Nevertheless it potential drawback should not be ove...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, hence, however, if, look, nevertheless, so, thus, while, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 10.5418719212 123% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 20.9802955665 105% => OK
Preposition: 23.0 31.9359605911 72% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 5.75862068966 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1065.0 1207.87684729 88% => OK
No of words: 207.0 242.827586207 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.14492753623 5.00649968141 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.79308509922 3.92707691288 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87626997935 2.71678728327 106% => OK
Unique words: 121.0 139.433497537 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.584541062802 0.580463131201 101% => OK
syllable_count: 333.9 379.143842365 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 4.6157635468 43% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.71428571429 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.65517241379 55% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 12.6551724138 63% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.5024630542 122% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 131.609982524 50.4703680194 261% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 133.125 104.977214359 127% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.875 20.9669160288 123% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.375 7.25397266985 129% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 10.0 5.33497536946 187% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 6.9802955665 72% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.17044929372 0.242375264174 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0582072541539 0.0925447433944 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.102708462543 0.071462118173 144% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.119364445449 0.151781067708 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.106590736085 0.0609392437508 175% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.7 12.6369458128 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 53.1260098522 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 10.9458128079 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.83 11.5310837438 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.15 8.32886699507 110% => OK
difficult_words: 56.0 55.0591133005 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.94827586207 116% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.3980295567 115% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.5123152709 124% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.