"Manned space flight is costly and dangerous. Moreover, the recent success of a series of unmanned space probes and satellites has demonstrated that a great deal of useful information can be gathered without the costs and risks associated with sending men and women into space. Therefore, we should invest our resources in unmanned space flight."
The argument claims that we should invest more in unmanned space flight rather than manned ones because unmanned ones are more cheap and less risky. Stated in this way, the argument does not present any risk analysis upon which its assumption can be established, and shows a vague perspective about the troubleshooting of space probes in case of failure. Therefore, the conclusion of the opinion which is based on such weak arguments are not completely flawless.
Firstly, the opinion does not demonstrate any risk and cost analysis of manned space probes for which it can be supported. For example, in a manufacturing company, to manufacture a specific product, robots are used instead of people. Although the resulting products may be dispatched with improved speed, the products are having flaws in them for which it can be clearly rejected. This is why, some top car manufacturing companys today are still using manual assembling technique to accomplish perfection which a machine can not ensure. So, the automatic space probes can be cheaper than manned space probes, but there is still skepticism whether they are conveying accurate information or not, while doing otherwise can be proved to be more perfect. Therefore, the argument can be stated if the risk and cost analysis was provided to support the conclusion.
In addition, automatons are not perfectly suited for unwanted troubleshooting if there occurs any. For the space expeditions to be successful, all the criteria should be checked properly. Thereby, if any aberrant phenomenon happens during the voyage, it is much easier for a person to meticulously analyze the problem and resolve it. To illustrate, at present time, the planes are switched to auto pilot mode while it is flying at a stable altitude nevertheless, there is always a pilot of flesh and blood to control the plane at the time of landing and take off because a person possess those acute analytical traits a machine lacks heretofore. So, it will be much expensive to build a bot containing features of a man to control the spaceship while on board.
To conclude, the argument have several flaws for which it can not be championed over. If it would provide such facts which would support its conclusion and had performed more detailed analysis, it would be undoubtedly impeccable.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-09-02 | Mahima1902 | 83 | view |
| 2023-01-23 | Pranav Lohote | 50 | view |
| 2022-12-31 | Kuldip851 | 66 | view |
| 2020-06-20 | impratik7 | 50 | view |
| 2019-11-03 | adnan_3082 | 66 | view |
- "All too often, companies hire outside consultants to suggest ways for the company to operate more efficiently. If companies were to spend more time listening to their own employees, such consultants would be unnecessary." 66
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Always telling the truth is the most important consideration in any relationship between people.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 81
- " Men and women, because of their inherent physical differences, are not equally suited for many tasks. "Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your position, 70
- Young people are better decision-maker than mature ones. 73
- "Many lives might be saved if inoculations against cow flu were routinely administered to all people in areas in which the disease is detected.However since there is a small possibility that a person will die as a result of the inoculations,we cannot 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, if, may, nevertheless, so, still, therefore, while, for example, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 28.0 19.5258426966 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 12.4196629213 121% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 14.8657303371 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.3162921348 71% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 33.0505617978 54% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 58.6224719101 65% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 12.9106741573 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1950.0 2235.4752809 87% => OK
No of words: 381.0 442.535393258 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.11811023622 5.05705443957 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.41805628031 4.55969084622 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84742671237 2.79657885939 102% => OK
Unique words: 206.0 215.323595506 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.540682414698 0.4932671777 110% => OK
syllable_count: 621.0 704.065955056 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 6.24550561798 64% => OK
Article: 9.0 4.99550561798 180% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.38483146067 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.2370786517 79% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 23.0359550562 100% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.1927138849 60.3974514979 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.875 118.986275619 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.8125 23.4991977007 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0625 5.21951772744 116% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 7.80617977528 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 10.2758426966 78% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 5.13820224719 117% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.236752200522 0.243740707755 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0806935824331 0.0831039109588 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0821974354173 0.0758088955206 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.13026782509 0.150359130593 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0930184100682 0.0667264976115 139% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 14.1392134831 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 48.8420337079 99% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 12.1743820225 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.71 12.1639044944 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.21 8.38706741573 110% => OK
difficult_words: 107.0 100.480337079 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 11.2143820225 100% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.