The best way for a society to prepare its young people for leadership in government, industry, or other fields is by instilling in them a sense of cooperation, not competition.
Is the best way for a society to prepare its young people for leadership is by instilling a sense of cooperation rather than competition? The speaker here believes so. I agree with the speaker's assertion to some extent, however, I also believe that a sense of competition is also equally necessary.
A really good example that can be considered here, is, a team of students working together for a project in their college. These people work in cooperation with each other and when they come up with their final product, it is much better than what any one person individually could have made in the given circumstances. If the same people would have had competition with each other, they might not have helped each other to do something better. Instead they would have focused on ways which would benefit themselves more. Such an attitude can never help an a team to thrive.
By cooperating with each other, people tend to understand each other in a much better way. They learn to respect each other and they also learn to respect each other's views. Also, an added advantage of cooperation could be that since everyone works in accord with each other, they tend to improve each other's performance. For example, consider a group of board members of a company, who want to take some critical decision. These people would have their own views, which obviously could have some faults. Since, these people work together, they would correct each other's faults and guide each other to do domething better. If these people would have been in competition, they would have not helped each other out and would have instead pointed out each other's mistakes in a way that would have caused a loss to one another.
Someone might say that because of competition, people try to overdo each other and try to come up with something better than their competitiors, and, in this way work more efficiently. This is true however there are some negative consequences of competition for example use of wrong methods to achieve better than the other or do something so that the performance of the competitor degrades. These kind of mal-practices happen in every place, where there is a competition, thus making the competion unhealthy and unfair. However, in cooperation, there are no derogatory consequences.
In conclusion, I would like to reassert my opinion that cooperation is a better way to prepare our young people for leadership, and, it is more important than competition. However, a sense of cooperation is also required.
- The best way for a society to prepare its young people for leadership in government, industry, or other fields is by instilling in them a sense of cooperation, not competition. 50
- "Scientific theories, which most people consider as 'fact: almost invariably prove to be inaccurate. Thus, one should look upon any information described as 'factual' with skepticism since it may well be proven false in the future.&quo 66
- The following appeared in a memorandum from a dean at Omega University."Fifteen years ago, Omega University implemented a new procedure that encouragedstudents to evaluate the teaching effectiveness of all their professors. Since that time, Omegaprof 55
- Sometimes imagination is a more valuable asset than experience. People who lack experience are free to imagine what is possible and thus can approach a task without constraints of established habits and attitudes. 58
- "Creating an appealing image has become more important in contemporary society than is the reality or truth behind that image." 16
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 186, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'speakers'' or 'speaker's'?
Suggestion: speakers'; speaker's
...aker here believes so. I agree with the speakers assertion to some extent, however, I al...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 340, Rule ID: IF_WOULD_HAVE_VBN[1]
Message: Did you mean 'had had'?
Suggestion: had had
...given circumstances. If the same people would have had competition with each other, they might...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 446, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Instead,
...lped each other to do something better. Instead they would have focused on ways which w...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 555, Rule ID: DT_DT[1]
Message: Maybe you need to remove one determiner so that only 'an' or 'a' is left.
Suggestion: an; a
...s more. Such an attitude can never help an a team to thrive. By cooperating wit...
^^^^
Line 9, column 303, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'others'' or 'other's'?
Suggestion: others'; other's
...h each other, they tend to improve each others performance. For example, consider a gr...
^^^^^^
Line 9, column 640, Rule ID: IF_WOULD_HAVE_VBN[1]
Message: Did you mean 'had been'?
Suggestion: had been
...to do domething better. If these people would have been in competition, they would have not hel...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 393, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this kind' or 'These kinds'?
Suggestion: This kind; These kinds
...performance of the competitor degrades. These kind of mal-practices happen in every place,...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, really, so, still, thus, for example, in conclusion, kind of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 19.5258426966 72% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 12.4196629213 137% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 14.8657303371 47% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.3162921348 106% => OK
Pronoun: 35.0 33.0505617978 106% => OK
Preposition: 58.0 58.6224719101 99% => OK
Nominalization: 18.0 12.9106741573 139% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2104.0 2235.4752809 94% => OK
No of words: 424.0 442.535393258 96% => OK
Chars per words: 4.96226415094 5.05705443957 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.53775939005 4.55969084622 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72229891018 2.79657885939 97% => OK
Unique words: 200.0 215.323595506 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.471698113208 0.4932671777 96% => OK
syllable_count: 659.7 704.065955056 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 15.0 6.24550561798 240% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.2370786517 104% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 23.0359550562 87% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.1607222499 60.3974514979 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.19047619 118.986275619 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.1904761905 23.4991977007 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.7619047619 5.21951772744 72% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 7.80617977528 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 10.2758426966 107% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 5.13820224719 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.24506728039 0.243740707755 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0872460900734 0.0831039109588 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.118587807499 0.0758088955206 156% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.181498022167 0.150359130593 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0906514056056 0.0667264976115 136% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 14.1392134831 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 48.8420337079 105% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 12.1743820225 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.49 12.1639044944 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.53 8.38706741573 90% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 100.480337079 78% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.8971910112 97% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 11.2143820225 89% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.