Governments should offer a free university education to any student who has been admitted to a university but who cannot afford the tuition.
Education is one of the most important infrastructure of development. Government must provide financial aid to the destitute student admitted in the student and cannot pursue their education due to financial impediment. In my opinion, I strongly agree with this suggestion that government should offer free university education to the student, admitted to a university, but cannot afford them for three reasons.
To begin, Literacy rate of a country is one of the major means to calculate HDI. Higher literacy results economic growth and better social life in the country. As literate people have great capabilities to deal things rationally, they tend to think critically and help the nation to progress by providing brilliant suggestions. For example European nation offers free education to its citizen that is why the literacy rate of European nation is high which had also helped in the financial growth of European country.
Further, Education is one of the basic right that has been conserved by the constitution of each and every nation. Government must focus on the fact that education should in reach to all citizen residing in its each and every nook and corner. This helps to reduce the knowledge gap between affluent people and impoverished people. Nepal government has started a good initiation by providing reservation quota in Agriculture and Forestry University for the underprivileged and marginalized people. This will help those indigent group of people to uplift their economic statues through the use of their knowledge obtained from the university.
Finally, Money should never be the barrier for education. The low financial status should never be the hindrance for the university education. For example, Kailali Model School, lying in Dhangadhi, has a slogan that money should never stop someone from studying. They help poor student for further study and provides scholarships. Government of developing nation must establish such school which can uplift the education status of the entire nation.
Admittedly some people might argue that government should not bear the tuition fee of any student. However this is not a rational decision because government must be aware of status of all the citizen. Uplifting those marginalized people will help nation to flourish financially. So, the government must help the impoverished people for the university education.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-22 | KarinaShine | 75 | view |
| 2019-12-30 | Sumaiya Mila | 50 | view |
| 2019-12-27 | stevewang1007 | 66 | view |
| 2019-12-03 | Moustafa Noufale | 66 | view |
| 2019-12-03 | Moustafa Noufale | 66 | view |
- Commuters complain that increased rush hour traffic on Blue Highway between the suburbs and the city center has doubled their commuting time The favored proposal of the motorists lobby is to widen the highway adding an additional lane of traffic Opponents 77
- Students do not respect teachers as much as they did in the past 70
- In surveys Mason City residents rank water sports (swimming, boating and fishing) among their favorite recreational activities. The Mason River flowing through the city is rarely used for these pursuits, however, and the city park department devotes littl 82
- Nations should pass laws to preserve any remaining wilderness areas in their natural state even if these areas could be developed for economic gain 66
- Claim No act is done purely for the benefit of others 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 100, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
...ot bear the tuition fee of any student. However this is not a rational decision because...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, however, if, so, for example, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 19.5258426966 51% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 12.4196629213 137% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 14.8657303371 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.3162921348 71% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 22.0 33.0505617978 67% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 58.6224719101 78% => OK
Nominalization: 26.0 12.9106741573 201% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2028.0 2235.4752809 91% => OK
No of words: 373.0 442.535393258 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.43699731903 5.05705443957 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.39467950092 4.55969084622 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87199322093 2.79657885939 103% => OK
Unique words: 191.0 215.323595506 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.512064343164 0.4932671777 104% => OK
syllable_count: 634.5 704.065955056 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 6.24550561798 80% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.2370786517 104% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 23.0359550562 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 39.8803198244 60.3974514979 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.5714285714 118.986275619 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.7619047619 23.4991977007 76% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.0 5.21951772744 57% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 10.2758426966 136% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.265481495972 0.243740707755 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0774130687734 0.0831039109588 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0902981736714 0.0758088955206 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.160724179877 0.150359130593 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.110453160447 0.0667264976115 166% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 14.1392134831 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 48.8420337079 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 12.1743820225 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.98 12.1639044944 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.59 8.38706741573 102% => OK
difficult_words: 97.0 100.480337079 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.8971910112 88% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 11.2143820225 78% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.