Some people believe that visitors to other countries should follow local customs and behaviour. Others disagree and think the host country should welcome cultural differences. Discuss both these views and give your opinion.
Opinions differ as to whether the tourists to the other countries should follow the host country's rituals as well as behaviour or the host country should accept a wide variety of cultures. As both the viewpoints have their own benefits, I, like many others, would side with the latter viewpoint on this matter.
Advocates of former view put forth the argument that the main purpose of tourism is to explore new things and have various experiences in their lives. Nowadays tourists are not only limited to visit and see other countries but also they tend to get acquainted with local rituals, their celebrations and traditions. For them, it gives relaxation and break the monotony of their lives. Participating in local traditions would definitely strengthen the feeling of uniformity. Even, tourists can also broaden their horizons about various cultural values. India is good paradigm of this where visitors come and enjoy Indian food as well as cultural diversification.
I, however, argue that the local authority should demonstrate the acceptance behaviour towards cultures of other countries. Visitors, who are new to the country and its traditions, might feel uncomfortable to accept the local beliefs. In Arab countries, for instance, women usually wear burkah to cover their entire body including head, and this might be awkward for the females from western countries as they are habitual of wearing loose clothes not covering entire body. Also, if locals will let the travellers follow their cultures, they feel comfortable and will visit to the host country again. Hence, in order to increase tourism and set a good precedent in front of tourists, government should allow them to follow their own beliefs.
In conclusion, despite the core meaning of tourism is to widen their knowledge by participating in the local cultural activities, I believe for the sake of positive experience to the travelers, authorities of host countries should always accept cultural diversification happily.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-11-14 | Angrej Singh | 76 | view |
- It is now possible for scientists and tourists to travel to remote natural environment, such as the South Pole. Do the advantages of this outweigh the disadvantages? 73
- Write a recommendation letter for your friend who is applying for a job. In your letter say:How long do you know him/her?What are the main qualities of your friend?What is his/her work experience? 78
- Some people believe the elderly said that life was better in the past Do you agree or disagree 95
- You will move to a new city for work. You know some people who live there. Ask them for help finding accommodation.Tell them where you would like to live.Tell them the type of place you are looking for. 70
- Some people say that it is impossible to live comfortably in big cities What problems are faced by the people living in big cities What solutions can be taken to solve those problems 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 17, Rule ID: WHETHER[6]
Message: Can you shorten this phrase to just 'whether', or rephrase the sentence to avoid "as to"?
Suggestion: whether
Opinions differ as to whether the tourists to the other countries sho...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, however, if, so, then, well, as to, for instance, in conclusion, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1688.0 1615.20841683 105% => OK
No of words: 317.0 315.596192385 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.32492113565 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21953715646 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80202550195 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 184.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.580441640379 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 513.9 506.74238477 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 57.3953795339 49.4020404114 116% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.571428571 106.682146367 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.6428571429 20.7667163134 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.64285714286 7.06120827912 94% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.293246884639 0.244688304435 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0985889597398 0.084324248473 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0994533575805 0.0667982634062 149% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.194586815561 0.151304729494 129% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0682871634019 0.056905535591 120% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 13.0946893788 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.87 12.4159519038 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.46 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 95.0 78.4519038076 121% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 9.78957915832 133% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.