pollution is too alarming to be managed by individuals. Real change can be made at the government level.
The importance/effect of Environment pollution is too alarming to be managed by individuals. Real change can be made at the government level, Which was highly debatable has now become more controversial. The substantial influence that has sparked Environment pollution is too alarming to be managed by individuals. Real change can be made at the government level controversy over the potential on this trend this change repression is government because this is government work over the recent years. It can be agreed that some positive impacts, but some negative impacts. This essay will discuss both the aspect will lead to logical Clausius/ elaborate.
It is outset, there are numerous positive reasons impacts on this topic but one of the most conspicuous one stream for effect that another preponderant one is that nowadays pollution is very fell and alarming to be managed by government. As a example, environment pollution handle to government. so, this topic plays the vital value role on this topic.
Nevertheless, some people adopt the opposing view point trend to believe idea. At a illustration this is not government works because this works handle to unpeople. Last but not least this is people work not government therefore, topic plays the negative role on this topic.
From what has been discuss above, It can be conclude that the impact of Environment pollution is too alarming to be managed by individuals. Real change can be made at the government level are prominence, although there are number of this is government works because some people think about to government works Those should not be overlooked.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-26 | amk79msce | 88 | view |
| 2020-01-06 | manraj123 | 11 | view |
| 2020-01-06 | manraj123 | 11 | view |
| 2020-01-03 | Ammu helen | 55 | view |
| 2019-12-30 | madhutalaari@gmail.com | 65 | view |
- Fresh water resources diminish in large cities in the world each year. 77
- cedcefc 11
- a few individuals trust iths goverments responsibility to guarantee that is notionals have a healthy diet. 84
- It is sometimes said that borrowing money from a friend can harm or damage the friendship. 77
- Problems and benefits for high school students study plays and works of theatres written centuries ago. discuss. 77
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 242, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...larming to be managed by government. As a example, environment pollution handle t...
^
Line 5, column 297, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: So
...ronment pollution handle to government. so, this topic plays the vital value role ...
^^
Line 9, column 83, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...ng view point trend to believe idea. At a illustration this is not government wor...
^
Line 13, column 20, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'discussed'.
Suggestion: discussed
... on this topic. From what has been discuss above, It can be conclude that the impa...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, look, nevertheless, so, therefore
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 26.0 10.5418719212 247% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 6.10837438424 131% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 8.36945812808 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 5.94088669951 101% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 20.9802955665 100% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 31.9359605911 94% => OK
Nominalization: 24.0 5.75862068966 417% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1379.0 1207.87684729 114% => OK
No of words: 263.0 242.827586207 108% => OK
Chars per words: 5.2433460076 5.00649968141 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.02706775958 3.92707691288 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.9636289366 2.71678728327 109% => OK
Unique words: 121.0 139.433497537 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.460076045627 0.580463131201 79% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 431.1 379.143842365 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 4.6157635468 108% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.71428571429 117% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.65517241379 55% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 12.6551724138 111% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.5024630542 88% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.7441026665 50.4703680194 106% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.5 104.977214359 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.7857142857 20.9669160288 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.71428571429 7.25397266985 37% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.33497536946 75% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 6.9802955665 72% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 2.75862068966 217% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.528950353375 0.242375264174 218% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.199726387567 0.0925447433944 216% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.175663979637 0.071462118173 246% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.353011638325 0.151781067708 233% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.270792153248 0.0609392437508 444% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 12.6369458128 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 53.1260098522 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.9458128079 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.11 11.5310837438 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.89 8.32886699507 95% => OK
difficult_words: 56.0 55.0591133005 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.94827586207 90% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.3980295567 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.5123152709 86% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 55.5555555556 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 50.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.