rules
The rules are provided to make life more organize and as a consequence more easier to run. There is a long-standing discussion among sociologists about the impacts of rules on young individuals today. Some of them believe that these rules are stringent that affect youth adversely. Others, however, point out that enforcement of these rules has some advantages that outweigh the drawbacks of it. Personally, I, to a huge extent, think that these rules are beneficial. Among countless reasons which can vindicate my point of view, I will mention the two conspicuous ones through the following essay.
The first reason that immediately comes into mind is that juveniles learn to be more responsible for their affairs. My own experience is a compelling example of this. When I was a student at the university, I lived in a dormitory that has some rules. For example, garbage was collected only once a day. Once I was so busy due to my assignment, I neglect to put trash out of my room. So my room had a terrible smell when I came back to it. After that, I oblige my self to put it out daily.
The second reason makes me hold this opinion is that it helps youth to be respectful to laws. To be more specific, when young people see the consequences of not applying the rules in their life can recognize how these laws are good toward the betterment of society. As a result, they respect them and society can go in a good way.
To wrap it up, if we take a glance into benefits of rules on society, it will be soon recognized that it is worthwhile to put some rules for young people as it teaches them to be responsible and helps them to understand the benefits of laws and respect them.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 72, Rule ID: MOST_COMPARATIVE[2]
Message: Use only 'easier' (without 'more') when you use the comparative.
Suggestion: easier
...life more organize and as a consequence more easier to run. There is a long-standing discus...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, second, so, while, for example, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 15.1003584229 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 9.8082437276 51% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 13.8261648746 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 15.0 11.0286738351 136% => OK
Pronoun: 48.0 43.0788530466 111% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 52.1666666667 82% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.0752688172 74% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1391.0 1977.66487455 70% => OK
No of words: 305.0 407.700716846 75% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.5606557377 4.8611393121 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17902490978 4.48103885553 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67976582065 2.67179642975 100% => OK
Unique words: 164.0 212.727598566 77% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.537704918033 0.524837075471 102% => OK
syllable_count: 444.6 618.680645161 72% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.6003584229 83% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 17.0 20.1344086022 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 51.009531642 48.9658058833 104% => OK
Chars per sentence: 81.8235294118 100.406767564 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.9411764706 20.6045352989 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.70588235294 5.45110844103 68% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.272788400153 0.236089414692 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0906595379003 0.076458572812 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.110566552862 0.0737576698707 150% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.175817884389 0.150856017488 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.141705054383 0.0645574589148 220% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.0 11.7677419355 76% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 58.1214874552 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.1575268817 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.87 10.9000537634 81% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.0 8.01818996416 100% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 86.8835125448 78% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 10.002688172 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.0537634409 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.