plastic bags and paper bags
In recent years, the earth is being filled with waste material such as plastic bags. That is why everyone would automatically think plastic bags have adverse effect on the environment. Therefore, scientists advise to use paper bags instead to be environmental - friendly. In fact, both have good points and negative aspects.
Securing land for waste disposal raises controversies in countries. As everyone knows, plastic is non - biodegradable material, which is hardly decomposed in the natural world. To solve this problem, the government have to bury all these wastes deeply into landfills so that countries are running out of space to store garbage and waste material. Plastic bags affect not only the landfills but also be the big hazard to the marine life. Among some surveys show that there are an increasing number of animals' death due to the plastic bags stucking in their throat. Seeing them screaming in pain suffering their hunger, their agony is such a lamentable scene. However, their low costs and their sustainability are good points of plastic bags. Because of their cheapness and lightweight, some customers still use plastic bags.
Comparing to plastic bags, paper bags will be more friendly to environment when they can be recycled one hundred percent or theirs abilities to decompose in natural environment but not polluting the environment. Besides, paper bags can be reused many times and also reduce significant amount of wastes released into the environment. Contrary to this, paper bags also bring negative effect to environment. Paper is made of wood, which will results in more and more trees being cut down. This may lead to forest destruction and some implication after. In addition to this, the production cost of paper bags are definitely higher than plastic bags.
In conclusion, both plastic bags and paper bags have their own benefits and detrimental effect on the environment. Undeniably, plastic bags
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
In recent years, the earth is being fill...
^^^^^
Line 1, column 95, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...aste material such as plastic bags. That is why everyone would automatically thin...
^^
Line 1, column 221, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'using'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'advise' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: using
...vironment. Therefore, scientists advise to use paper bags instead to be environmental ...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ave good points and negative aspects. Securing land for waste disposal raises ...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ome customers still use plastic bags. Comparing to plastic bags, paper bags wi...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... definitely higher than plastic bags. In conclusion, both plastic bags and pap...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 146, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...he environment. Undeniably, plastic bags
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, however, if, may, so, still, therefore, in addition, in conclusion, in fact, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1635.0 1615.20841683 101% => OK
No of words: 310.0 315.596192385 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.27419354839 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.19604776685 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75511112796 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 176.0 176.041082164 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.567741935484 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 495.9 506.74238477 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 16.0721442886 124% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.2975951904 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 39.4583324534 49.4020404114 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 81.75 106.682146367 77% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.5 20.7667163134 75% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.2 7.06120827912 74% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 5.01903807615 139% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 3.9879759519 251% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.473425600798 0.244688304435 193% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.174278648613 0.084324248473 207% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.166757928268 0.0667982634062 250% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.378333515674 0.151304729494 250% => Maybe some contents are duplicated.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.160041233893 0.056905535591 281% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.1 13.0946893788 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 56.25 50.2224549098 112% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.3001002004 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.99 12.4159519038 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.3 8.58950901804 97% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 78.4519038076 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.1190380762 79% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.