TPO 21- Integrated essay
Both, the reading and the lecture, talk about the use of trees genetically modified. While the author claims that it bring many advantages, the lecturer affirms that, even when its benefits are unquestionable, it has significant drawbacks. She refutes each reason presented, casting doubts in the author's beliefs.
Firstly, the reading points out that genetically modified trees have a higher survival rate, owing to they are more resistant to virus infection. However, the professor disproves this idea by noticing that, those plants have no genetic diversity, due to that, they are resistant only to that event they were created to resist. but, if occur a different incident, they will all die, since they are genetically almost exact copies. On the other hand, natural trees are genetically diverse, therefore, when they cope an adverse event, just die those that are not genetically prepared to face it, but others will survive.
Secondly, the text argues that, owing to modified trees grow more swiftly, they are more profitable that their wild counterpart. Nonetheless, the orator contradicts this argument and affirms that companies sell modified seeds more expensive that the natural ones. Furthermore, by law, farmers cannot get seeds from this generation and use them for the next harvest for free, they must pay to the companies again, which means an increment in their costs.
Finally, the author remarks that with the use of genetically modified plants, it is possible to meet the demand of wood, which reduces drastically the exploitation of the forest. Notwithstanding, the professor highlights that, as a result of its elevated rate of growing, those plant are more aggressive in their fight to obtain natural resources, leaving out of the competence their natural counterpart. As a result, the latter will suffer negative consequences.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-11-25 | aldovega0516 | 90 | view |
| 2019-05-17 | nahid77777777 | 68 | view |
| 2017-10-15 | Hamed Tg | 76 | view |
| 2017-02-08 | HamdyTawfeek | 80 | view |
| 2015-12-17 | Samar 1984 | 60 | view |
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? The extended family (grandparents, cousins, aunts, and uncles) is less important now than it was in the past. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 78
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Life today is easier and more comfortable than it was when your grandparents were children. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 76
- Private collectors have been selling and buying fossils, the petrified remains of ancient organisms, ever since the eighteenth century. In recent years, however, the sale of fossils, particularly of dinosaurs and other large vertebrates, has grown into a 3
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? People today spend too much time on personal enjoyment-doing things they like to do-rather than doing things they should do. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 85
- In an effort to encourage ecologically sustainable forestry practices, an international organization started issuing certifications to wood companies that meet high ecological standards by conserving resources and recycling materials. Companies that recei 3
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 328, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: But
...that event they were created to resist. but, if occur a different incident, they wi...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, firstly, furthermore, however, if, nonetheless, second, secondly, so, therefore, while, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.4613686534 96% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 5.04856512141 99% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 7.30242825607 55% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 17.0 12.0772626932 141% => OK
Pronoun: 39.0 22.412803532 174% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 28.0 30.3222958057 92% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.01324503311 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1581.0 1373.03311258 115% => OK
No of words: 293.0 270.72406181 108% => OK
Chars per words: 5.39590443686 5.08290768461 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13729897018 4.04702891845 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79145002993 2.5805825403 108% => OK
Unique words: 176.0 145.348785872 121% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.600682593857 0.540411800872 111% => OK
syllable_count: 481.5 419.366225166 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 3.25607064018 276% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 1.25165562914 479% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 2.5761589404 194% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 13.0662251656 99% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 21.2450331126 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.8724944121 49.2860985944 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.615384615 110.228320801 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.5384615385 21.698381199 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.6923076923 7.06452816374 151% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 4.45695364238 157% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.341438804022 0.272083759551 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.114234420794 0.0996497079465 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0791671982706 0.0662205650399 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.1845849558 0.162205337803 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0589072880812 0.0443174109184 133% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 13.3589403974 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 53.8541721854 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.0289183223 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.34 12.2367328918 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.04 8.42419426049 107% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 63.6247240618 126% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.7273730684 103% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.498013245 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.