Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? The opinion of celebrities, such as entertainers and athletes, are more important to younger people than they are to older people.
It is no secret that in this progressive and modernized world the so-called celebrities in every society are followed by people and particularly by youngsters. In this regard, some people are inclined toward this opinion that these famous people mostly are followed by young people whereas others hold exactly an opposite perspective. As far as I am concerned, the former is more acceptable. In the following paragraphs, I will elaborate on my viewpoint through two noticeable reasons.
First, one should take into account the fact that youngsters are more exposed to different information, so the more information about celebrities the higher importance for an individual. There are a wide variety of applications on the Internet such as Instagram, telegram, to name but a few, in which every celebrity has their own page and tries to attract more followers. On the other hand, young people are more interested in these applications among all the people of a community. Therefore, it is crystal clear that the possibility of a young person to be exposed to specific news about celebrities is much higher than an old one. To shed light on this issue, a study has been conducted in our country last year. In this study, the outputs of the three applications that are used by most of the people were investigated. Based on the study’s result, about 75 percent of all users’ ages were in the range 15 to 38. It is completely obvious that a high portion of users were young people, which is compelling evidence that young people are more subjected to celebrities’ posts and news.
Another equally noteworthy point supporting this opinion is that celebrities play as role models in every community. It is no secret that young people lack enough experience and so, their personalities are not figured completely. Therefore, they attempt to find a role model for themselves based on their interests and factors. In this vein, celebrities’ reputation and appearance have a significant effect on youngsters’ decision in order to select a role model. As soon as, they choose a celebrity, they try to imitate some of that celebrity’s actions or even lifestyle. As an example to illustrate this issue, when I was a high school student, I was fascinated by Nicole Kidman. So, I followed all the news that was related to her. When I found she is a vegetarian, although I liked foods contain meat, I tried to copy her diet and became a vegetarian. This personal example shows that every young person can be impressed by a celebrity and changed parts of her or his lifestyle.
To wrap it up, all the aforementioned reasons lead us to the conclusion that since young individuals need a role model in their lives and also, as they access to various information resources, they are more fascinated by celebrities than older people. Consequently, the celebrities’ opinions and beliefs and lifestyles are more important for youngsters.
- Two years ago, radio station WCQP in Rockville decided to increase the number of call-in advice programs that it broadcast; since that time, its share of the radio audience in the Rockville listening area has increased significantly. Given WCQP's rec 55
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?When classmates or colleagues communicate about a project in person instead of by e-mail, they will produce better work for the project. 73
- To be an effective leader, a public official must maintain the highest ethical and moral standards.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your position, be sure to addre 79
- Movies and television have more negative effects on the way young people behave. 76
- People who are the most deeply committed to an idea or policy are also the most critical of it.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In deve 66
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, if, so, therefore, whereas, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 29.0 15.1003584229 192% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 9.8082437276 41% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 13.8261648746 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 17.0 11.0286738351 154% => OK
Pronoun: 55.0 43.0788530466 128% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 63.0 52.1666666667 121% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.0752688172 111% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2471.0 1977.66487455 125% => OK
No of words: 488.0 407.700716846 120% => OK
Chars per words: 5.06352459016 4.8611393121 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.70007681154 4.48103885553 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.13894764327 2.67179642975 117% => OK
Unique words: 254.0 212.727598566 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.520491803279 0.524837075471 99% => OK
syllable_count: 798.3 618.680645161 129% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 14.0 9.59856630824 146% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 3.51792114695 199% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 10.0 4.94265232975 202% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.6003584229 112% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.7974226237 48.9658058833 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.434782609 100.406767564 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.2173913043 20.6045352989 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.73913043478 5.45110844103 69% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 11.8709677419 118% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.88709677419 143% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.162343798065 0.236089414692 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0482639576006 0.076458572812 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0411579935026 0.0737576698707 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.119372741661 0.150856017488 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0465961813916 0.0645574589148 72% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 11.7677419355 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 58.1214874552 86% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.10430107527 183% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.1575268817 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.07 10.9000537634 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.59 8.01818996416 107% => OK
difficult_words: 121.0 86.8835125448 139% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 10.002688172 120% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.