The table below shows the worldwide market share of the notebook computer market for manufacturers in the years 2006 and 2007.
The presented table depicts information about the global market share of a different brand of notebooks classified into HP, Dell, Acer, Toshiba, Lenovo, Fujitsu-Siemens (F-S) and the ones that are not referred in the chart named as others, within two consecutive years, 2006 and 2007. The data is calibrated in percentage.
At first glance, it is immediately obvious that the HP contributed the largest proportion of the market share in both years, whilst F-S had the smallest share. Moreover, whereas the HP, Dell and Toshiba experienced a marked increase in the proportion of market over the period, the others saw a corresponding decline.
When observing data in more detail, in 2006 the most significant business share was recorded by HP brand with standing at 31.4% and increased steadily to reach the point of 34%. In comparison to the market share of the Dell computers, which rose to 20.2%, the figure for Acer Company declined to just over 10%.
The percentage of notebook sales of Toshiba firm was initially almost as similar as that of Lenovo, which was 6.2% and 6.6%, respectively, but while the former increased by 7%, the latter witnessed minimal fall to 6.2%. F-S again was responsible the least ratio of whole market (2.3%) at the end of the survey and the same trend was true for remained companies which decreased from 22.8% to 19.3%.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-11 | faraj27 | 84 | view |
| 2019-09-05 | Theagh | 78 | view |
| 2019-08-18 | cnade95 | 78 | view |
| 2019-08-18 | raminghorbanii | 67 | view |
| 2019-07-28 | bhullarb476@gmail.com | 56 | view |
- The chart below gives information about birth and death rates in Switzerland from 1970 to 2020 according to United Nations statistics Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 70
- The charts below show the percentage of water used for different purposes in six areas of the world. 84
- The table below shows the monthly expenditure of an average Australian family in 1991 and 2001. 78
- The tables below give information about sales of Fairtrade*-labelled tea and pineapples in 2010 and 2015 in five European countries. 73
- The graph below shows the number of university graduates in Canada from 1992 to 2007.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant. 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, moreover, so, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.15609756098 222% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1140.0 965.302439024 118% => OK
No of words: 227.0 196.424390244 116% => OK
Chars per words: 5.02202643172 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.88156143495 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.711431378 2.65546596893 102% => OK
Unique words: 139.0 106.607317073 130% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.612334801762 0.547539520022 112% => OK
syllable_count: 330.3 283.868780488 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 28.0 22.4926829268 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 65.5567502245 43.030603864 152% => OK
Chars per sentence: 142.5 112.824112599 126% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.375 22.9334400587 124% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.5 5.23603664747 105% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.225785141301 0.215688989381 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0896986955532 0.103423049105 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0616212602 0.0843802449381 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.134673935893 0.15604864568 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0394558114651 0.0819641961636 48% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.4 13.2329268293 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.52 61.2550243902 84% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 10.3012195122 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.13 11.4140731707 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.41 8.06136585366 117% => OK
difficult_words: 63.0 40.7170731707 155% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.4329268293 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.9970731707 120% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.