New parents should attend parenting courses to ensure the growth of their children. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
It has been said that new parents should take part in the nurturing program which are especially designed for them to bring up their children in the best way. While I accept that the skills provided in these courses are important, I would argue that this policy should not be considered an obligation for every family/household.
On the one hand, I agree that parenting courses are beneficial for couples. Nursing is definitely not a simple task, especially for those who have never had any experience about childcare. Participating in these classes, people are equipped with skills and knowledge which are essential for their parental roles. For example, they would learn how to feed or how to help their toddlers to take medicine. Also, they would acquire knowledge about infant’s psychology, which can help them to have appropriate behaviors towards their children. Parents in general love babies and they are less likely to put strict discipline on their children. Therefore, if they arbitrarily pamper their children, they can spoil their offspring easily.
However, I would argue that it is not necessary for all parents to sign up for this course. Firstly, the parenting training session fee is usually high, which does not allow every spouse to enroll in this program. Consequently, they would opt for books or video clips on the internet that can provide them with crucial parental skills. In addition, people are now getting busier than ever before. If they are constrained to attend these courses, they have to be absent from their work or study. And this might have a negative impact on their job or schooling results. Moreover, a person can also learn from their parents or relatives who have valuable experiences and lessons about raising children.
In conclusion, while I agree that the parenting course is useful for new fathers and mothers, I believe that individuals can achieve this significant knowledge through other ways.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-13 | LucyLiu | 67 | view |
| 2019-11-24 | BangLangTim | 73 | view |
| 2019-08-08 | nnhhuunngg | 67 | view |
| 2019-06-27 | tien.xinh.ne | 56 | view |
| 2019-03-24 | Rapunzel | 61 | view |
- Although more and more people read the news on the internet, newspaper will remain the main source of news for the majority of people. Do you agree or disagree with the statement? 78
- Many museums and historical sites are mainly visited by tourists but not local people. Why is this the case and what can be done to attract more local people to visit these places? 84
- People cart eat a wide variety of food that can be grown in other areas. As a result, people eat more food produced in other regions than local food. Do you think the advantages of this trend outweigh the disadvantages? 84
- Some people think that children should begin their formal education at a very early age. Some think they should begin at least 7 years old. Discuss both views give opinions ? 73
- Many people think that the media should show more stories which report good news. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, consequently, first, firstly, however, if, moreover, so, therefore, while, for example, in addition, in conclusion, in general
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 7.30460921844 192% => OK
Pronoun: 46.0 24.0651302605 191% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1649.0 1615.20841683 102% => OK
No of words: 318.0 315.596192385 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.18553459119 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22286093782 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68788284943 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 177.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.556603773585 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 496.8 506.74238477 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 5.43587174349 184% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.1504904534 49.4020404114 67% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.0 106.682146367 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.7058823529 20.7667163134 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.76470588235 7.06120827912 110% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.245721839443 0.244688304435 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.088665941577 0.084324248473 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0603061449347 0.0667982634062 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.16749894266 0.151304729494 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0125113308021 0.056905535591 22% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 13.0946893788 95% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.82 12.4159519038 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.45 8.58950901804 98% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 78.4519038076 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.